Re: openoffice.org for i686 rebuilt on current ac-main (neon,

2006-01-22 Thread Bartosz Taudul
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 12:32:31AM +0100, Tomasz Pala wrote: > > I'm not saying 'now', but in general. arekm's openoffice rpms are > > sitting there for some time now and they work quite well. > They still don't. I cannot write more than 64k chars to document > (oowriter), SOA#1, http://team.pld-li

Re: openoffice.org for i686 rebuilt on current ac-main (neon,

2006-01-22 Thread Tomasz Pala
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 20:36:35 +0100, Bartosz Taudul wrote: > I'm not saying 'now', but in general. arekm's openoffice rpms are > sitting there for some time now and they work quite well. They still don't. I cannot write more than 64k chars to document (oowriter), and menus have wrong font or D

Re: openoffice.org for i686 rebuilt on current ac-main (neon,

2006-01-22 Thread Bartosz Taudul
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 07:49:51PM +0100, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote: > > > http://ep09.pld-linux.org/~arekm/openoffice.org/ > > What about sending it to builders? > It is easy to guess why it is wrong time: arekm is building new kde. > And locking builders for many hours while it may be neccessa

Re: openoffice.org for i686 rebuilt on current ac-main (neon,

2006-01-22 Thread Andrzej Krzysztofowicz
Bartosz Taudul wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 01:19:15PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > > If anyone is interested: > > http://ep09.pld-linux.org/~arekm/openoffice.org/ > What about sending it to builders? It is easy to guess why it is wrong time: arekm is building new kde. And locking b

Re: openoffice.org for i686 rebuilt on current ac-main (neon, openldap deps)

2006-01-22 Thread Bartosz Taudul
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 01:19:15PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > If anyone is interested: > http://ep09.pld-linux.org/~arekm/openoffice.org/ What about sending it to builders? wolf -- Bartek . - Pan długopisem stawia? Taudul : - A co się będę chrzanił. .:...

Re: python qt

2006-01-22 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On Saturday 21 January 2006 18:39, Tomasz Wittner wrote: > On Sat 21. of January 2006 12:05, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > > so could somebody confirm or fix this? > > No, I can't, because, among other things, I don't have amd64. Also, I've > never touched python-PyQt.spec, thus I don't understand, why ha

Re: AC TODO [19/01/2006]

2006-01-22 Thread Adam Gołębiowski
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 03:03:28PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > On Sunday 22 January 2006 14:55, Adam Gołębiowski wrote: > > > I've received a few positive responses about 1.5-0.2. I've bumped relase > > to 1, would be great if you could send to ready. > > Sent, what about dictionaries?

Re: AC TODO [19/01/2006]

2006-01-22 Thread Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
On Sunday 22 January 2006 14:55, Adam Gołębiowski wrote: > I've received a few positive responses about 1.5-0.2. I've bumped relase > to 1, would be great if you could send to ready. Sent, what about dictionaries? -- Arkadiusz MiśkiewiczPLD/Linux Team http://www.t17.ds.pwr.w

Re: AC TODO [19/01/2006]

2006-01-22 Thread Adam Gołębiowski
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 10:14:34PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > On Thursday 19 January 2006 19:18, Adam Gołębiowski wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 06:17:10PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > > > Probably at the end of month I'll start tagging AC-release so there is > > > still a few

openoffice.org for i686 rebuilt on current ac-main (neon, openldap deps)

2006-01-22 Thread Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
If anyone is interested: http://ep09.pld-linux.org/~arekm/openoffice.org/ (Almost) No changes apart rebuild. -- Arkadiusz MiśkiewiczPLD/Linux Team http://www.t17.ds.pwr.wroc.pl/~misiek/ http://ftp.pld-linux.org/ ___ pld-devel-en m