> oh, and this one too. if the changelog is complete, the filelist is 30 pages
> far away, comparing to "on next page"
I'm using mc if I must browse rpm contents :)
M.
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linu
> in binary rpm's. why pointless?
Few KB more or less per rpm makes no difference for me.
> changelog isn't compressed, and some small packages have more in changelog in
Small packages usually doesn't have big changelogs. Of course there are
exceptions.
> truncating specfile changelog just to
On Thursday 27 April 2006 19:29, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On Thursday 27 April 2006 15:37, Marcin Król wrote:
> > > but while we were discussing migration to svn it was stated
> > > that we really need complete changelog. always.
> >
> > Wait a second. I got lost. glen wants to cut changelog in CVS/S
On Thursday 27 April 2006 15:04, wrobell wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 14:03 +0200, Marcin Król wrote:
> > > how this all relates to subversion repository and claims that
> > > you always need complete changelog?
> >
> > But we don't build any rpms from subversion?
>
> but while we were discussing
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 19:52 +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On Thursday 27 April 2006 19:29, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> > On Thursday 27 April 2006 15:37, Marcin Król wrote:
> > > > but while we were discussing migration to svn it was stated
> > > > that we really need complete changelog. always.
> > >
>
On Thursday 27 April 2006 15:37, Marcin Król wrote:
> > but while we were discussing migration to svn it was stated
> > that we really need complete changelog. always.
>
> Wait a second. I got lost. glen wants to cut changelog in CVS/SVN or in
> packages at build time? If in specs, then some of the
> but while we were discussing migration to svn it was stated
> that we really need complete changelog. always.
Wait a second. I got lost. Glen wants to cut changelog in CVS/SVN or in
packages at build time? If in specs, then some of them have already been
cut manually. If in rpms, isn't it pointl
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 14:03 +0200, Marcin Król wrote:
> > how this all relates to subversion repository and claims that
> > you always need complete changelog?
>
> But we don't build any rpms from subversion?
but while we were discussing migration to svn it was stated
that we really need complete
> how this all relates to subversion repository and claims that
> you always need complete changelog?
But we don't build any rpms from subversion?
M.
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listi
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 13:07 +0200, Marcin Król wrote:
> > and if you want complete changelog, you can always use cvsweb.
>
> or cvs log at commandline :)
how this all relates to subversion repository and claims that
you always need complete changelog?
wrobell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> and if you want complete changelog, you can always use cvsweb.
or cvs log at commandline :)
M.
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
There is a serious security issue with all versions of linux-vserver.
All versions 2.0 and above are vulnerable.
Description:
Setting context capability (ccapabilities) gives rights to use
operations allowed by this capability to all users inside vserver.
All users of kernel-vserver are urged to
On Thursday 27 April 2006 11:15, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Apr 2006, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> > hi
> >
> > i made patch to truncate changelog at build time [1].
> > the question is how many entries to limit the truncation, and should the
> > truncation setting be different for Ac and Th?
>
>
On Wed, 26 Apr 2006, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> hi
>
> i made patch to truncate changelog at build time [1].
> the question is how many entries to limit the truncation, and should the
> truncation setting be different for Ac and Th?
At least 3 months worth, preferably half a year.
You can't just cu
14 matches
Mail list logo
