On Pungenday, Confusion 12, 3172 YOLD, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> altho i can't confirm support of svg in opera and konqueror as i don't
> need .svg support there ;)
Opera 8.x has incomplete support for SVG, Opera 9 Beta has full
support. Details (in Polish) and screenshots at
http://zdzichubg.jogg
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 11:09:00PM +0200, Mariusz Mazur wrote:
> There was a tragic accident resulting in four out of five th builders getting
> seriously mutilated. The lucky survivor is x86-64. Since it's generally
> agreed that this is currently the best architecture around and bound to
> bec
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 23:09 +0200, Mariusz Mazur wrote:
> There was a tragic accident resulting in four out of five th builders getting
> seriously mutilated. The lucky survivor is x86-64. Since it's generally
> agreed that this is currently the best architecture around and bound to
> become the
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 23:09 +0200, Mariusz Mazur wrote:
> There was a tragic accident resulting in four out of five th builders getting
> seriously mutilated. The lucky survivor is x86-64. Since it's generally
> agreed that this is currently the best architecture around and bound to
> become the
There was a tragic accident resulting in four out of five th builders getting
seriously mutilated. The lucky survivor is x86-64. Since it's generally
agreed that this is currently the best architecture around and bound to
become the most popular, I've decided to have pld3.0 support only one arch
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 02:19:47PM +0200, Adam Gołębiowski wrote:
> /dev/nvram is 600,root,root now. In order to use kmilo's thinkpad
> plugin, this has to be at least readable by user (at least read-only is
> sufficient for volume controls and 'access ibm' button).
>
> Anyone objects on changing
/dev/nvram is 600,root,root now. In order to use kmilo's thinkpad
plugin, this has to be at least readable by user (at least read-only is
sufficient for volume controls and 'access ibm' button).
Anyone objects on changing it to 664,root,root? Or maybe it would be
better to 660,root,$group, but wh
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 02:52:44PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> ooo 2 to ac?
>
> are there any problems with that?
> amd64 can be forgotten, as ooo1 doesn't have it either.
ppc/sparc build is not verified (anyone cares about these?)
And I'd wait for OOo 2.0.3, which is scheduled to be released
ooo 2 to ac?
are there any problems with that?
amd64 can be forgotten, as ooo1 doesn't have it either.
--
glen
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
On Wednesday 07 June 2006 14:32, zbyniu wrote:
> Author: zbyniu Date: Wed Jun 7 11:32:34 2006 GMT
> Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD
> Log message:
> - proper bconds support
the modules are in subpackages and dlopen()'ed, so the deps are just build
time.
On Wednesday 07 June 2006 13:34, Fryderyk Dziarmagowski wrote:
> --- Elan Ruusamäe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wednesday 07 June 2006 12:43, you wrote:
> > > Author: freetz Date: Wed Jun 7 09:43:54 2006 GMT
> > > Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD
> > > ---
--- Elan Ruusamäe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 June 2006 12:43, you wrote:
> > Author: freetz Date: Wed Jun 7 09:43:54 2006 GMT
> > Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD
> > Log message:
> > - 2.15.0, dropped mozilla plugin (every recent gecko-
On Wednesday 07 June 2006 12:43, you wrote:
> Author: freetz Date: Wed Jun 7 09:43:54 2006 GMT
> Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD
> Log message:
> - 2.15.0, dropped mozilla plugin (every recent gecko-based browser provides
> svg displaying support), blee
13 matches
Mail list logo
