On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 01:19:14PM +0200, glen wrote:
Author: glen Date: Tue Aug 22 11:19:14 2006 GMT
Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD
Log message:
- dir to symlink change hack, rel 2
Maybe just drop that symlink?
libtunepimp 0.5 changed API, so
what about creating perl-dirs.spec (like there are php-dirs.spec,
gcc-dirs.spec and php-pear.spec)?
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: SPECS: perl.spec - added %{perl_vendorlib}/Email/Simple
Date: Sunday 13 August 2006 00:38
From: ankry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
glen wrote:
-Release: 1
+Release: 2
# same as perl
License: GPL v1+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Languages/Perl
@@ -19,22 +19,24 @@
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Set-Infinite/
BuildRequires: perl-devel = 1:5.8.0
BuildRequires:
Elan =?iso-8859-1?q?Ruusam=E4e?= wrote:
what about creating perl-dirs.spec (like there are php-dirs.spec,
gcc-dirs.spec and php-pear.spec)?
Do you volunteer ?
Especially in fixing R: ;)
--
===
Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz
On Tuesday 22 August 2006 19:54, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
Elan =?iso-8859-1?q?Ruusam=E4e?= wrote:
what about creating perl-dirs.spec (like there are php-dirs.spec,
gcc-dirs.spec and php-pear.spec)?
Do you volunteer ?
Especially in fixing R: ;)
i don't see it neccessary, as perl-base
glen wrote:
+%dir %{perl_vendorlib}/Apache2
Why not to perl-dirs ?
--
===
Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone (48)(58) 347 14 61
Faculty of Applied Phys. Math., Gdansk University of
On Tuesday 22 August 2006 21:41, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
glen wrote:
+%dir %{perl_vendorlib}/Apache2
Why not to perl-dirs ?
it's only package using that dir, and afaik there's no policy what goes to
single package and what goes elsewhere.
poldek:/all-avail search -f
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 03:29:45PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
(crosspost warning)
kernel24 2.4.33-0.2 is going to ac-test now, please test it and report
any new bugs (especially regressions).
Rebuilt, with 2.4.33.1 patch applied (which fixes one security bug and
few oopses/panics)
Linux
