Re: browser-plugins

2006-09-05 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On Tuesday 05 September 2006 23:14, Patryk Zawadzki wrote: > How do we handle things like totem? It used to provide one file named > totem_mozilla.so. Now it provides: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpm -ql browser-plugin-totem > /usr/lib/browser-plugins/libtotem-basic-plugin.so > /usr/lib/browser-plugi

browser-plugins

2006-09-05 Thread Patryk Zawadzki
How do we handle things like totem? It used to provide one file named totem_mozilla.so. Now it provides: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpm -ql browser-plugin-totem /usr/lib/browser-plugins/libtotem-basic-plugin.so /usr/lib/browser-plugins/libtotem-basic-plugin.xpt /usr/lib/browser-plugins/libtotem-complex

Re: very ugly setup <-> glibc dependancy

2006-09-05 Thread Paweł Gołaszewski
On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > > > > now setup (which normlly should be the first package installed) > > > > requires postshell which is in glibc (this one requires many > > > > things), maybe it would be possible to move env-update to some > > > > trigger, or create separeted packag

Re: env-update and umask

2006-09-05 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
fixed in env-update-1.6.14-3 On Tuesday 05 September 2006 21:05, Tomasz Mateja wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# chmod 644 /etc/*.env > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ls /etc/*.env -la > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 211 Sep 5 19:43 /etc/csh.env > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 213 Sep 5 19:43 /etc/profile.env > [EMAIL

Re: very ugly setup <-> glibc dependancy

2006-09-05 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On Tuesday 05 September 2006 17:58, Paweł Gołaszewski wrote: > On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > > > now setup (which normlly should be the first package installed) > > > requires postshell which is in glibc (this one requires many things), > > > maybe it would be possible to move env-upda

env-update and umask

2006-09-05 Thread Tomasz Mateja
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# chmod 644 /etc/*.env [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ls /etc/*.env -la -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 211 Sep 5 19:43 /etc/csh.env -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 213 Sep 5 19:43 /etc/profile.env [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# env-update [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ls /etc/*.env -la -rw--- 1 root root 211 Sep

Re: very ugly setup <-> glibc dependancy

2006-09-05 Thread Paweł Gołaszewski
On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > > now setup (which normlly should be the first package installed) > > requires postshell which is in glibc (this one requires many things), > > maybe it would be possible to move env-update to some trigger, or > > create separeted package/spec for posts

Re: very ugly setup <-> glibc dependancy

2006-09-05 Thread sparky
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 04:24:40PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > Ukhm... postshell would require FHS (because of directories), FHS > requires setup (because of %attr with non-root groups). in setup.spec there already are files which go to /sbin/ -- Sparky{PI] -- Przemyslaw _ ___ _ _ .

Re: very ugly setup <-> glibc dependancy

2006-09-05 Thread sparky
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 04:24:40PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 04:21:27PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 05:19:03PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > > > On Tuesday 05 September 2006 17:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > now setup (which normlly s

Re: very ugly setup <-> glibc dependancy

2006-09-05 Thread Jakub Bogusz
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 04:21:27PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 05:19:03PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > > On Tuesday 05 September 2006 17:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > now setup (which normlly should be the first package installed) > > > requires postshell which i

Re: very ugly setup <-> glibc dependancy

2006-09-05 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On Tuesday 05 September 2006 17:21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > /me votes for postshell.spec go ahead ;) -- glen ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

Re: very ugly setup <-> glibc dependancy

2006-09-05 Thread sparky
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 05:19:03PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > On Tuesday 05 September 2006 17:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > now setup (which normlly should be the first package installed) > > requires postshell which is in glibc (this one requires many things), > > maybe it would be possible

Re: very ugly setup <-> glibc dependancy

2006-09-05 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On Tuesday 05 September 2006 17:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > now setup (which normlly should be the first package installed) > requires postshell which is in glibc (this one requires many things), > maybe it would be possible to move env-update to some trigger, or create > separeted package/spec

very ugly setup <-> glibc dependancy

2006-09-05 Thread sparky
now setup (which normlly should be the first package installed) requires postshell which is in glibc (this one requires many things), maybe it would be possible to move env-update to some trigger, or create separeted package/spec for postshell ? -- Sparky{PI] -- Przemyslaw _ ___ _ _ ..