Re: SPECS: swiftfox.spec - update License

2006-09-20 Thread Piotr Skwarna
Cezary Krzyzanowski napisał(a): > > Maby just easier? mozilla-firefox-swift ? > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > its nor mozilla neither firefox. -- +PLUG +PLD http://www.linux.pl | [Quoting Sergiusz Pawłowicz] RLU 301329 spider(at)linux(dot)pl | "głupota to straszny wirus."

Re: SPECS: swiftfox.spec - update License

2006-09-20 Thread Cezary Krzyzanowski
Dnia 20-09-2006, śro o godzinie 12:43 +0200, Tomasz Mateja napisał(a): > According to license we can name it f.ex. pldswitfox or switfox-PLD and > make it distributable :) Yes - if we make it build from their sources, which isn't as easy as it seems. I've failed to build it from spec, by hand or

Re: SPECS: libpng.spec - properly reverted changes

2006-09-20 Thread Łukasz Jernaś
Dnia środa, 20 września 2006 12:43, deejay1 napisał: > Author: deejay1 Date: Wed Sep 20 10:43:54 2006 GMT > Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD > Log message: > - properly reverted changes BTW how to let libtool using apps link to libpng properly? I have some

Re: SPECS: swiftfox.spec - update License

2006-09-20 Thread Tomasz Mateja
glen wrote: > Author: glen Date: Tue Sep 19 12:55:42 2006 GMT > Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD > Log message: > - update License > > Files affected: > SPECS: >swiftfox.spec (1.1 -> 1.2) > > Diffs: > > ==

Re: alt kernel bugs

2006-09-20 Thread sparky
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 01:37:36AM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] pld/SPECS $ rpm --define 'alt_kernel desktop' -E > '%{_kernel_ver}' > 2.6.17.11_desktop-0.1.1smp > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] pld/SPECS $ rpm --define 'alt_kernel desktop' -E > '%{_kernel_ver}smp' > 2.6.17.11_desktop-