Re: OOo 2.1.0

2007-03-05 Thread Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
Dnia 06-03-2007, wto o godzinie 01:14 +0100, Szymon Siwek napisał(a): > It's definitely gcc-4.2 related (th-i686) What about gcc-4.1.2? -- __("< Marcin Kowalczyk \__/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ^^ http://qrnik.knm.org.pl/~qrczak/ _

Re: OOo 2.1.0

2007-03-05 Thread Szymon Siwek
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 10:36:41PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > On Monday 05 of March 2007, Adam Gołębiowski wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 11:03:23PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > > > there's OOo 2.1.0-0.m6 in ac-i586, ac-i686 ready trees > > > > > > happy testing! > > > > Kudos! > >

Re: OOo 2.1.0

2007-03-05 Thread Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
On Monday 05 of March 2007, Adam Gołębiowski wrote: > On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 11:03:23PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > > there's OOo 2.1.0-0.m6 in ac-i586, ac-i686 ready trees > > > > happy testing! > > Kudos! I have Th version for amd64, too (built in current enviroment). Unfortunately there is

Re: OOo 2.1.0

2007-03-05 Thread Adam Gołębiowski
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 11:03:23PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > there's OOo 2.1.0-0.m6 in ac-i586, ac-i686 ready trees > > happy testing! Kudos! Thanks. -- http://www.mysza.eu.org/ | Everybody needs someone sure, someone true, PLD Linux developer| Everybody needs some solid rock, I kn

OOo 2.1.0

2007-03-05 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
there's OOo 2.1.0-0.m6 in ac-i586, ac-i686 ready trees happy testing! -- glen ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

Re: Google Summer of Code

2007-03-05 Thread Michal Chruszcz
On 05/03/07, Adam Gołębiowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Have a look at jajcus's recent thread on pld-discuss. It has been > discussed there. Uhm, then excuse me, I'm not subscribed to pld-discuss. -- Michal Chruszcz To follow the path: look to the master, follow the master, walk with the

Re: Google Summer of Code

2007-03-05 Thread Adam Gołębiowski
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 08:22:06PM +0100, Michal Chruszcz wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Today has begun the new edition of Google Summer of Code. From now on > projects may supply applications to Google until March 12. Full > timeline is here: > http://code.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=6032

Google Summer of Code

2007-03-05 Thread Michal Chruszcz
Hi everyone, Today has begun the new edition of Google Summer of Code. From now on projects may supply applications to Google until March 12. Full timeline is here: http://code.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=60325&topic=10729 Are we willing to miss the chance again this year? Or are we go

Re: Error in in builder check_buildarch

2007-03-05 Thread Kacper Kornet
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 06:15:32PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > On Monday 05 March 2007 18:01:25 Kacper Kornet wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 04:56:58PM +0100, Kacper Kornet wrote: > > > Best solution that I could find is in the attachment. > > And the forgotten attachment. > and please supp

Re: Error in in builder check_buildarch

2007-03-05 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On Monday 05 March 2007 18:01:25 Kacper Kornet wrote: > On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 04:56:58PM +0100, Kacper Kornet wrote: > > Best solution that I could find is in the attachment. > > And the forgotten attachment. and please supply command to test? -- glen __

Re: Error in in builder check_buildarch

2007-03-05 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On Monday 05 March 2007 18:01:25 Kacper Kornet wrote: > On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 04:56:58PM +0100, Kacper Kornet wrote: > > Best solution that I could find is in the attachment. > > And the forgotten attachment. i'm not sure are the define parameters necccessary at that context? i guess we don't u

Re: Error in in builder check_buildarch

2007-03-05 Thread Kacper Kornet
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 04:56:58PM +0100, Kacper Kornet wrote: > Best solution that I could find is in the attachment. And the forgotten attachment. -- Kacper Kornet Index: builder === RCS file: /cvsroot/SPECS/builder,v retrieving

Error in in builder check_buildarch

2007-03-05 Thread Kacper Kornet
The check_buildarch does not work correctly when the builder is called with the --define argument. Best solution that I could find is in the attachment. Best wishes, -- Kacper Kornet ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http:

Re: ERRORS: openvpn.spec

2007-03-05 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On Sunday 25 February 2007, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote: > > $ rpmbuild --define "prep %dump" openvpn.spec 2>&1 | grep PACKAGE_VERSION > >  -1: PACKAGE_VERSION    2.0 > > > > and that happens because there is subpackage with Version field in > > openvpn.spec. > > However, the 1.380 builder handles

Re: SPECS (AC-branch): nessus-core.spec - missing dir; rel 2

2007-03-05 Thread Jakub Bogusz
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:06:54AM +0100, glen wrote: > %files -n nessus-devel > %defattr(644,root,root,755) > +%dir %{_includedir}/nessus It belongs to nessus-libs-devel (already required by nessus-devel). -- Jakub Boguszhttp://qboosh.pl/ ___ p