On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 10:48:52PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 03:11:17PM +0100, glen wrote:
> > Author: glen Date: Sun Mar 18 14:11:17 2007
> > GMT
> > Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD
> > Log message:
> > - separated -libs; rel
On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 03:11:17PM +0100, glen wrote:
> Author: glen Date: Sun Mar 18 14:11:17 2007
> GMT
> Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD
> Log message:
> - separated -libs; rel 2
Isn't it overkill?
This way we'd end with *-libs in all lib* packages..
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007, Marcin Król wrote:
> > BTW - maybe someone would like to mail again to pine-developers and
> > gain license for distribution...? Of course, if the patches are ok (on
> > my utf console it works perfect :) ).
> We are allowed to distribute pine with all versions of PLD with pa
> BTW - maybe someone would like to mail again to pine-developers and gain
> license for distribution...? Of course, if the patches are ok (on my utf
> console it works perfect :) ).
We are allowed to distribute pine with all versions of PLD with patches that
were accepted. Check license file fo
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007, Tomasz Pala wrote:
> > Can you try latest mc from Th (2007-03-09-18)?. It looks like
> > something improved in this snapshot.
> mc-4.6.2-0.2007.03.09.18.2
>
> and unfortunatelly the problem still exists.
Apropos...
Please, test on utf console pine
Build "--without distribut
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 02:47:18PM +0200, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
>
> Can you try latest mc from Th (2007-03-09-18)?. It looks like something
> improved in this snapshot.
mc-4.6.2-0.2007.03.09.18.2
and unfortunatelly the problem still exists.
--
Tom Pala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://vfmg
