Re: SPECS: poldek.spec - does not require sed

2007-06-19 Thread Jakub Bogusz
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 02:20:31AM +0200, glen wrote: > Author: glen Date: Wed Jun 20 00:20:31 2007 GMT > Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD > Log message: > - does not require sed IIRC it was for vfjuggle and other scripts... -- Jakub Boguszhttp://

Re: NEW poldek 0.20070617.23 - please test

2007-06-19 Thread Paweł A . Gajda
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tuesday 19/06/2007 10:59:17, Michał Łukaszek: > Invoked: poldek -n th -n th-test -n th-i686 -n th-test-i686 > My arch: x86_64 > Fixed. > I did not manage to upgrade expat. I had to uninstall expat (i686) and > expat, expat-devel (x86_64) with --nodeps --nofollow, and then in

Re: SOURCES (AC-branch): poldek-ignorecaps.patch - update to poldek-0....

2007-06-19 Thread Marcin Król
> where should i commit it then? it's USABLE for AC, as it fixes (hopefully > when > more tested) long-lasting pain on multiarch, making total pita upgrading > packages on those arches. Snapshots have bad habbit of making things not working :/ As I see it few threads above those snapshots still

Re: SOURCES (AC-branch): poldek-ignorecaps.patch - update to poldek-0....

2007-06-19 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On Tuesday 19 June 2007, Marcin Król wrote: > > Author: glen Date: Tue Jun 19 11:12:32 2007 GMT > > Module: SOURCES Tag: AC-branch > > Log message: > > - update to poldek-0.20.1-cvs20070618.11 > > Snapshot on AC-branch? I hope you've good reasons l

Re: SOURCES (AC-branch): poldek-ignorecaps.patch - update to poldek-0....

2007-06-19 Thread Marcin Król
> Author: glen Date: Tue Jun 19 11:12:32 2007 GMT > Module: SOURCES Tag: AC-branch > Log message: > - update to poldek-0.20.1-cvs20070618.11 Snapshot on AC-branch? I hope you've good reasons like security fixes :) M. _

Re: NEW poldek 0.20070618.11.1 (Ac)

2007-06-19 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On Tuesday 19 June 2007, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > On Monday 18 June 2007, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > > Hello, > > > > New poldek snap (0.20070617.23) was sent to Th builders. It has > > improvements in handling package colors and *tadam* multilib > > capabilities. > > > > Please test :) > > poldek

Re: NEW poldek 0.20070617.23 - please test

2007-06-19 Thread Jan Rekorajski
On Sun, 17 Jun 2007, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > > Hello, > > New poldek snap (0.20070617.23) was sent to Th builders. It has improvements > in handling package colors and *tadam* multilib capabilities. > > Please test :) poldek:/all-avail> uninstall php-* error: php-*: no such package Alw

Re: NEW poldek 0.20070618.11.1 (Ac)

2007-06-19 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On Monday 18 June 2007, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > Hello, > > New poldek snap (0.20070617.23) was sent to Th builders. It has > improvements in handling package colors and *tadam* multilib capabilities. > > Please test :) poldek-0:0.20.1-0.20070618.11.1.amd64 (ac) rpm-0:4.4.2-45.amd64 [EMAIL P

Re: NEW poldek 0.20070617.23 - please test

2007-06-19 Thread Michał Łukaszek
On 6/19/07, Michał Łukaszek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > package name-rel.arch triplet to uninstall. I meant, name-ver-rel.arch ;-) -- regards, Michał Łukaszek [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lis

Re: NEW poldek 0.20070617.23 - please test

2007-06-19 Thread Michał Łukaszek
On 6/19/07, Pawel A. Gajda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can't reproduce this: Maybe it only shows up when multilib repository is also enabled? See below for poldek invokation. > I need more info to investigate: how poldek is invoked, what is config, etc > Could you give me your /var/lib/rpm/Pack

Re: NEW poldek 0.20070617.23 - please test

2007-06-19 Thread Pawel A. Gajda
Monday 18/06/2007 23:59:22, Michał Łukaszek: > But, the following behaviour is another unwanted "feature" (sorry for > the locale): > > Installing set #7 > Przetwarzanie zależności... > libsmbclient-3.0.24-3.x86_64 zostanie zastąpiony przez > libsmbclient-3.0.25a-1.x86_64 > Zaznaczono 2 pakiety do

Re: [CVS] RPM: rpm/rpmdb/ rpmdb.c

2007-06-19 Thread Tomasz Mateja
Jeff Johnson napisał(a): > On Jun 18, 2007, at 5:34 PM, Tomasz Mateja wrote: > >> Jeff Johnson napisał(a): >> One issue remaining on my sparc64 - I cannot use >> %_binary_payloadw9.lzdio. >> When I build package with lzdio I have: >> Upgrading... >> 1:autoconf >> ##