On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 22:06 +0200, Cezary Krzyżanowski wrote:
>
> 2007/8/1, Patryk Zawadzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Is there anything against switching all NameObsoletes
> (Obsoletes: gdm
> in kdm etc.) to conflicts or dropping them altogether?
>
> I am the
2007/8/1, Jakub Bogusz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> Leaving users with --force is not an option.
Why? It's a clear solution: Something conflicts, like default installs of
apache/lighttpd (or any other -- I'm not referring to this particular pair)
conflicting on the 80 port. You get "If you really n
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 09:07:35PM +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
> Is there anything against switching all NameObsoletes (Obsoletes: gdm
> in kdm etc.) to conflicts or dropping them altogether?
>
> I am the admin and I want to decide what to install with what. If I
> want 2 login managers, that's m
2007/8/1, Patryk Zawadzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Is there anything against switching all NameObsoletes (Obsoletes: gdm
> in kdm etc.) to conflicts or dropping them altogether?
>
> I am the admin and I want to decide what to install with what. If I
> want 2 login managers, that's my problem, if I
Is there anything against switching all NameObsoletes (Obsoletes: gdm
in kdm etc.) to conflicts or dropping them altogether?
I am the admin and I want to decide what to install with what. If I
want 2 login managers, that's my problem, if I want 3 smtp services,
that's my problem.
Secondly, all ma
