http://wklej.org/id/0868358518
What I break?;) And how to fix that?
--
Regards, Kamil Dziedzic
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.o
On Mar 17, 2008, at 5:44 PM, Tomasz Wittner wrote:
>
> IMO construction like `if(foo) free(foo);' has little value (maybe
> is useful
> for performance reasons - conditional instruction vs. calling
> function - I
> don't know). I didn't write any piece of C code for ages, but it
> seems to
On Monday 17 of March 2008, 21:12, glen wrote:
> Author: glen Date: Mon Mar 17 20:12:18 2008 GMT
> Module: SOURCES Tag: rpm-4_4_9
> Log message:
> - more _free() compatible, however no luck still
>
> Files affected:
> SOURCES:
>rpm-lualeak
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Kamil Dziedzic wrote:
> What do you think about adding make-request.sh script to rpm-build-tools
> package or to separate package/spec make-request.spec?
Separate spec
--
pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesjabbergdapl
---
What do you think about adding make-request.sh script to rpm-build-tools
package or to separate package/spec make-request.spec?
--
Regards, Kamil Dziedzic
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
pld-devel-en mailing li
On Sunday 16 March 2008 14:06:07 Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> found too something similar from one vserver root dir:
appears that such sequence of macros in rpm 4.4.9 causes the mess and TMPDIR
macros containing garbage:
$ tail -n3 ~/.rpmmacros
%_tmppath %{expand:%%global _tmppath %{lua:print(os.gete
err, where's the popt coming in here? and why? and why it's not in shared lib
list?
dlopen(".libs/gnome.so", 1)
= NULL
dlerror()
= "/usr/lib/libg
