Re: libcdio - o co chodzi z tą zależnoś cią?

2008-04-23 Thread Jeff Johnson
On Apr 23, 2008, at 6:41 PM, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > On Wednesday 23 April 2008 23:40, Jakub Bogusz wrote: >>> Raczej libmagic do poprawki - skoro uznaje to za ELF, to to >>> powinno mieć >>> priorytet. >> >> [en] >> I think libmagic should be fixed - when it treats library as ELF >> (printing

Re: Fwd: libcdio - o co chodzi z tą zależnością?

2008-04-23 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On Wednesday 23 April 2008 23:40, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > >  Raczej libmagic do poprawki - skoro uznaje to za ELF, to to powinno mieć > >  priorytet. > > [en] > I think libmagic should be fixed - when it treats library as ELF > (printing further information, like linking type and stripping), it > sho

Re: Fwd: libcdio - o co chodzi z tą zależnością?

2008-04-23 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On Wednesday 23 April 2008 23:22, Patryk Zawadzki wrote: > cross-posting do devel-en as glen is interested in this: indeed. magic matches for that file as the iso magic is so tiny: file-4.23$ grep -r CD-ROM . ./magic/Magdir/filesystems:>38913 string !NSR0 ISO 9660 CD-ROM filesystem data

Re: Fwd: libcdio - o co cho dzi z tą zależnością?

2008-04-23 Thread Jakub Bogusz
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 10:22:53PM +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote: > cross-posting do devel-en as glen is interested in this: > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Jakub Bogusz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2008/4/16 > Subject: Re: libcdio - o co chodzi z tą zależnością? > To: "PLD: D

Fwd: libcdio - o co ch odzi z tą zależnością?

2008-04-23 Thread Patryk Zawadzki
cross-posting do devel-en as glen is interested in this: -- Forwarded message -- From: Jakub Bogusz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 2008/4/16 Subject: Re: libcdio - o co chodzi z tą zależnością? To: "PLD: Developers list (Polish)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 03:00:35PM

Re: SPECS (LINUX_2_6): kernel.spec - killed creating arch/{i386, x86_64...

2008-04-23 Thread Marcin Krol
> Guys, please stop fighting and actually do explain and dive into > details when replying. It could be that you are both right just > approaching the same problem from two different angles. Keep PLD a > healthy place for further flamewars :) Problem is already fixed, flame is over and next time I

Re: SPECS (LINUX_2_6): kernel.spec - killed creating arch/{i386, x86_64...

2008-04-23 Thread Patryk Zawadzki
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Marcin Krol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > you're not paying attention what i say. so this is last email in this thread > > from me. bye! > And vice versa :) Thanks god I've forked. Keep breaking more stuff. Guys, please stop fighting and actually do explain and

Re: SPECS (LINUX_2_6): kernel.spec - killed creating arch/{i386, x86_64...

2008-04-23 Thread Marcin Krol
> you're not paying attention what i say. so this is last email in this thread > from me. bye! And vice versa :) Thanks god I've forked. Keep breaking more stuff. M. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.

Re: SPECS (LINUX_2_6): kernel.spec - killed creating arch/{i386, x86_64...

2008-04-23 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On Tuesday 22 April 2008 20:40, Marcin Krol wrote: > > that is still package install stage, not package build time. > > there is no such thing as directory deps are added to package. these are > > verified at package installation stage. > > If its at install stage, not build time then how my privat