On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 12:18:52AM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 May 2008 09:07, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> > any suggestions how to fix?
>
> options i see:
> 1. do not define HOSTCFLAGS on ppc
> 2. include '-I$(src)/dtc-src/ -I$(src)/libfdt/' in spec HOSTCFLAGS
> 3. use some other varia
On Tuesday 06 May 2008 09:07, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> any suggestions how to fix?
options i see:
1. do not define HOSTCFLAGS on ppc
2. include '-I$(src)/dtc-src/ -I$(src)/libfdt/' in spec HOSTCFLAGS
3. use some other variable than HOSTCFLAGS to pass host cflags (!)
anyway, why the += doesn't have
Dnia środa, 7 maja 2008, Tomasz Wittner napisał:
[...]
> What's going on?
Correct me, if I'm wrong, but it seems, that all these packages didn't build
on i486 architecture, therefore they were not uploaded on the ftp server.
--
Łukasz Maśko GG: 244149
On Wednesday 07 of May 2008, 17:40, Kamil Dziedzic wrote:
> Could somebody fix that?
For now on I can't. In my environment building [EMAIL PROTECTED] failed after:
+
[ -a
/home/users/tw/tmp/qt4-4.4.0-root-tw/usr/include/qt4/Qt/Q3CanvasPolygonalItem ]
+ ifecho Qt3Support-devel /usr/include/qt4/Qt
Could somebody fix that?
http://buildlogs.pld-linux.org/index.php?dist=th&arch=x86_64&ok=0&name=VirtualBox
Thanks;)
--
Regards, Kamil Dziedzic
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel
On Wednesday 07 May 2008 17:47:40 Tomasz Wittner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 1. I cannot find recently built packages on Th FTP - f.e.
> qt4-4.4.0*-1.i686.rpm . I checked ftp://master-ftp.pld-linux.org.
> 2. There are a few packages under
> ftp://master-ftp.pld-linux.org/dists/th/ready/i686/RPMS/ - AFAIK this
Hi,
1. I cannot find recently built packages on Th FTP - f.e.
qt4-4.4.0*-1.i686.rpm . I checked ftp://master-ftp.pld-linux.org.
2. There are a few packages under
ftp://master-ftp.pld-linux.org/dists/th/ready/i686/RPMS/ - AFAIK this
directory should be emty for the time being.
What's going on?
On Sat, 3 May 2008, Tomasz Pala wrote:
> > Unmaintained tetex will finally dissapear from ftp... that is why I'm
> > asking what will be lost/broken when replacing tetex with texlive...
> If so - better ask about incompatibilities.
I was thinking about "incompatibilities" saying "broken" :)
> I'
