On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:00:09PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On Friday 23 May 2008 12:01:11 Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> > anyone can suggest macro name for /usr/share/php?
> >
> > %php_data_dir
> > %php_apps_dir
> > %php
>
> still nobody?
I'd use %php_data_dir, as it contains more than just (w
On Friday 23 May 2008 12:01:11 Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> anyone can suggest macro name for /usr/share/php?
>
> %php_data_dir
> %php_apps_dir
> %php
still nobody?
--
glen
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-l
On Friday 23 May 2008 19:03:45 Kamil Dziedzic wrote:
> [en] What do you think about moving PLD-doc/PLD-specs-TODO to wiki? Or
> maybe about some integration with wiki? Everybody could then add new
> propositions of specs, not only developers. You know, not all PLD users are
> developers;)
so no pr
On Tuesday 10 June 2008 01:59:04 Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
> The problem we are currently facing is that installing packages to a
> fresh system results in poldek being confused about coreutils + pam
> circular deps.
i guess it's rather rpm being confused? the circular loops can be broken with
rpm-w
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 7:43 AM, Jakub Bogusz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 12:59:04AM +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
>> Two proposed solutions:
>>
>> 1) move parts of %post in make and pam to %posttrans so they are
>> executed after the transaction is complete - ugly but coul