Re: permission of /home/services

2008-07-21 Thread Marcin Krol
> ??? Just some of my old habits, nothing to worry about. M. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

Re: permission of /home/services

2008-07-21 Thread Jakub Bogusz
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 11:59:20AM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > why it's non readable for everybody: > drwxr-x--x 11 root adm 124 2008-05-28 05:48 /home/services/ > ? > > as i have uid=builder $HOME=/home/services/builder (as i consider it service, > not real user). > > however such parent dir

Re: permission of /home/services

2008-07-21 Thread Jakub Bogusz
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 12:14:51PM +0200, Marcin Krol wrote: > > my suggestion is to change it to 755,root,root as i don't see much gain > > other than security by obscurity > > and adding builder user to adm group i don't want to do either. assuming > > home dir of 'service' should be /home/serv

Re: permission of /home/services

2008-07-21 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On Monday 21 July 2008 14:39:34 Marcin Krol wrote: > > and doing chmod on directory from rpm package, will make the permissions > > lost again if the owner package is upgraded. this is not consistent > > behaviour. > > This can be prevented with %_netsharedpath. I'm using it ie. for > /var/mail whe

Re: permission of /home/services

2008-07-21 Thread Marcin Krol
> and doing chmod on directory from rpm package, will make the permissions lost > again if the owner package is upgraded. this is not consistent behaviour. This can be prevented with %_netsharedpath. I'm using it ie. for /var/mail where our distribution default permissions prevent creation of n

Re: permission of /home/services

2008-07-21 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On Monday 21 July 2008 13:14:51 Marcin Krol wrote: > > my suggestion is to change it to 755,root,root as i don't see much gain > > other than security by obscurity and adding builder user to adm group i > > don't want to do either. assuming home dir of 'service' should be > > /home/services. > > I'

Re: permission of /home/services

2008-07-21 Thread Tomasz Pala
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 12:34:44 +0200, Szymon Siwek wrote: >> why it's non readable for everybody: >> drwxr-x--x 11 root adm 124 2008-05-28 05:48 /home/services/ >> ? >> > I have similiar question about /srv /home/services/ listing is available via /etc/passwd, while /srv is not. >> my suggest

Re: SPECS: gcc.spec rel 3; include ecj here; patch by uzi18/o2.pl

2008-07-21 Thread Szymon Siwek
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 01:10:35PM +0200, arekm wrote: > Author: arekmDate: Sun Jul 20 11:10:35 2008 GMT > Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD > Log message: > rel 3; include ecj here; patch by uzi18/o2.pl > > Files affected: > SPECS: >gcc.spec (1.

Re: permission of /home/services

2008-07-21 Thread Szymon Siwek
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 11:59:20AM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > why it's non readable for everybody: > drwxr-x--x 11 root adm 124 2008-05-28 05:48 /home/services/ > ? > I have similiar question about /srv > my suggestion is to change it to 755,root,root as i don't see much gain other > than sec

Re: permission of /home/services

2008-07-21 Thread Marcin Krol
> my suggestion is to change it to 755,root,root as i don't see much gain other > than security by obscurity > and adding builder user to adm group i don't want to do either. assuming home > dir of 'service' should be /home/services. I'm happy with current permissions as I don't need to chmod ev

permission of /home/services

2008-07-21 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
why it's non readable for everybody: drwxr-x--x 11 root adm 124 2008-05-28 05:48 /home/services/ ? as i have uid=builder $HOME=/home/services/builder (as i consider it service, not real user). however such parent dir permission causes some weird problems like: 1. + /usr/bin/perl Build.PL destd