Re: CVSROOT: cvswrappers - treat patches as binary files

2008-11-04 Thread Patryk Zawadzki
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 1:35 AM, Tomasz Pala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 22:13:29 +0100, Patryk Zawadzki wrote: been there, done that. It breaks Python. Please attach testcase (original and modified file). foo1.py is the original, foo.patch is the patch against that

Re: CVSROOT: cvswrappers - treat patches as binary files

2008-11-04 Thread Patryk Zawadzki
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Tomasz Pala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 10:04:40 +0100, Patryk Zawadzki wrote: foo1.py is the original, foo.patch is the patch against that (altered to mention foo2.py for easy testing). foo2.py is the new file. Run: It's the _patch_ that's

Re: CVSROOT: cvswrappers - treat patches as binary files

2008-11-04 Thread Jakub Bogusz
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 05:47:04PM +0100, Patryk Zawadzki wrote: On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Tomasz Pala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 10:04:40 +0100, Patryk Zawadzki wrote: [...] patch -p0 -l foo.patch to break the code instead of failing. Oh, breaking the code

ANN: New kernel in Th - 2.6.27.4

2008-11-04 Thread Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
Hello, There is a new kernel in Th - 2.6.27.4. It supports (+/-) the same stuff as 2.6.25.x was + additionally grsec_full and apparmor by default. Please test it and report bugs. 0.1 rel runs on carme for last few days without problems. -- Arkadiusz MiśkiewiczPLD/Linux Team arekm /

Re: PLD-doc: uid_gid.db.txt - tabs

2008-11-04 Thread Jakub Bogusz
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 09:50:30PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: On Tuesday 04 November 2008 20:22:07 qboosh wrote: @@ -446,9 +446,9 @@ 199bfilter bfilter HTTP filtering proxy 200pound pound Reverse-proxy and load-balancer 201

Re: ANN: New kernel in Th - 2.6.27.4

2008-11-04 Thread Lukasz Kies
2008/11/4 Arkadiusz Miskiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello, There is a new kernel in Th - 2.6.27.4. It supports (+/-) the same stuff as 2.6.25.x was + additionally grsec_full and apparmor by default. Please test it and report bugs. 0.1 rel runs on carme for last few days without problems. I

Re: ANN: New kernel in Th - 2.6.27.4

2008-11-04 Thread Michał Łukaszek
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 6:59 PM, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, There is a new kernel in Th - 2.6.27.4. It supports (+/-) the same stuff as 2.6.25.x was + additionally grsec_full and apparmor by default. Please test it and report bugs. 0.1 rel runs on carme for last few

Re: ANN: New kernel in Th - 2.6.27.4

2008-11-04 Thread Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
On Tuesday 04 of November 2008, Michał Łukaszek wrote: On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 6:59 PM, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, There is a new kernel in Th - 2.6.27.4. It supports (+/-) the same stuff as 2.6.25.x was + additionally grsec_full and apparmor by default.

Re: ANN: New kernel in Th - 2.6.27.4

2008-11-04 Thread Fryderyk Dziarmagowski
On Tue, 4 Nov 2008 21:07:46 +0100 Lukasz Kies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2008/11/4 Arkadiusz Miskiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello, There is a new kernel in Th - 2.6.27.4. It supports (+/-) the same stuff as 2.6.25.x was + additionally grsec_full and apparmor by default. Please test it

Re: ANN: New kernel in Th - 2.6.27.4

2008-11-04 Thread Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
On Tuesday 04 of November 2008, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: On Tuesday 04 of November 2008, Lukasz Kies wrote: 2008/11/4 Arkadiusz Miskiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello, There is a new kernel in Th - 2.6.27.4. It supports (+/-) the same stuff as 2.6.25.x was + additionally grsec_full

Re: ANN: New kernel in Th - 2.6.27.4

2008-11-04 Thread Lukasz Kies
2008/11/4 Arkadiusz Miskiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Tuesday 04 of November 2008, Lukasz Kies wrote: 2008/11/4 Arkadiusz Miskiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello, There is a new kernel in Th - 2.6.27.4. It supports (+/-) the same stuff as 2.6.25.x was + additionally grsec_full and apparmor by