On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 1:35 AM, Tomasz Pala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 22:13:29 +0100, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
been there,
done that. It breaks Python.
Please attach testcase (original and modified file).
foo1.py is the original, foo.patch is the patch against that
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Tomasz Pala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 10:04:40 +0100, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
foo1.py is the original, foo.patch is the patch against that (altered
to mention foo2.py for easy testing). foo2.py is the new file. Run:
It's the _patch_ that's
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 05:47:04PM +0100, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Tomasz Pala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 10:04:40 +0100, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
[...]
patch -p0 -l foo.patch
to break the code instead of failing.
Oh, breaking the code
Hello,
There is a new kernel in Th - 2.6.27.4. It supports (+/-) the same stuff as
2.6.25.x was + additionally grsec_full and apparmor by default.
Please test it and report bugs. 0.1 rel runs on carme for last few days
without problems.
--
Arkadiusz MiśkiewiczPLD/Linux Team
arekm /
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 09:50:30PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On Tuesday 04 November 2008 20:22:07 qboosh wrote:
@@ -446,9 +446,9 @@
199bfilter bfilter HTTP filtering proxy
200pound pound Reverse-proxy and load-balancer
201
2008/11/4 Arkadiusz Miskiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
There is a new kernel in Th - 2.6.27.4. It supports (+/-) the same stuff as
2.6.25.x was + additionally grsec_full and apparmor by default.
Please test it and report bugs. 0.1 rel runs on carme for last few days
without problems.
I
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 6:59 PM, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
There is a new kernel in Th - 2.6.27.4. It supports (+/-) the same stuff as
2.6.25.x was + additionally grsec_full and apparmor by default.
Please test it and report bugs. 0.1 rel runs on carme for last few
On Tuesday 04 of November 2008, Michał Łukaszek wrote:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 6:59 PM, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello,
There is a new kernel in Th - 2.6.27.4. It supports (+/-) the same stuff
as 2.6.25.x was + additionally grsec_full and apparmor by default.
On Tue, 4 Nov 2008 21:07:46 +0100
Lukasz Kies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/11/4 Arkadiusz Miskiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
There is a new kernel in Th - 2.6.27.4. It supports (+/-) the same stuff as
2.6.25.x was + additionally grsec_full and apparmor by default.
Please test it
On Tuesday 04 of November 2008, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
On Tuesday 04 of November 2008, Lukasz Kies wrote:
2008/11/4 Arkadiusz Miskiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
There is a new kernel in Th - 2.6.27.4. It supports (+/-) the same
stuff as 2.6.25.x was + additionally grsec_full
2008/11/4 Arkadiusz Miskiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tuesday 04 of November 2008, Lukasz Kies wrote:
2008/11/4 Arkadiusz Miskiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
There is a new kernel in Th - 2.6.27.4. It supports (+/-) the same stuff
as 2.6.25.x was + additionally grsec_full and apparmor by
11 matches
Mail list logo