On Dec 6, 2008, at 6:37 PM, wrobell wrote:
[1] my desktop machine is so huuug, baby
Well I dunno nothin' about your desktop.
But my desktop has accumulated 1,337,924.20 cobblestones
patiently grinding away, mostly [EMAIL PROTECTED], through BOINC.
I hope to contribute 0.005% to
On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 06:05:57PM -0500, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>
> On Dec 6, 2008, at 5:35 PM, wrobell wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>> But points noted fer sure, TeX is not easy packaging, never has been.
>>
>> indeed :)
>>
>
> Note I dinna say either of
> (Diskspace|bandwidth) is cheap.
> Being stoopid i
On Dec 6, 2008, at 5:35 PM, wrobell wrote:
But points noted fer sure, TeX is not easy packaging, never has been.
indeed :)
Note I dinna say either of
(Diskspace|bandwidth) is cheap.
Being stoopid is way more costly than commodity items. Ugly and evil
have the same flaws.
He
On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 05:19:41PM -0500, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>
> On Dec 6, 2008, at 4:41 PM, wrobell wrote:
>
>>
>> [1] my asus eee pc has 4GB of storage, so don't event try to tell me
>> that
>>sdd space is cheap
>>
>> [2] i am accessing internet via 3G, so please don't tell me that
>> ba
On Dec 6, 2008, at 4:41 PM, wrobell wrote:
[1] my asus eee pc has 4GB of storage, so don't event try to tell me
that
sdd space is cheap
[2] i am accessing internet via 3G, so please don't tell me that
bandwith
is cheap, as well
Well asus eee is not exactly representative hqrdwar
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 06:35:29PM +0100, Zsolt Udvari wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> I want to create texlive.spec, and it's under developing. I use the
> tetex.spec as the beginning, but I've a question: should I split more
> subpackages the texlive package? What I think: the style-files,
> documentclas
