Re: Native upstart scripts – implemented

2010-05-09 Thread Jacek Konieczny
On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 02:52:57AM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > also, configtest before reload/restart action would be really important to > have in upstart as well, considering that we restart services on rpm > upgrades. Done. Not for 'initctl reload' (which is only 'kill -HUP'), but for 'serv

libuuid-dietlibc

2010-05-09 Thread Jakub Bogusz
It seems that libuuid-dietlibc should have its own pkgconfig file (in /usr/lib/dietlibc/pkgconfig?), specifying additional -lcompat, because dietlibc libc.a doesn't contain syscall(): /usr/lib/dietlibc/lib-i386/libuuid.a(gen_uuid.o): In function `get_random_bytes': (.text+0x1d6): undefined refere

Re: Native upstart scripts – implemented

2010-05-09 Thread Jacek Konieczny
On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 12:26:56PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > On Sunday 09 May 2010 12:00:57 Jacek Konieczny wrote: > > > also seems the "nice service name" is lost there (see sshd part). > > > > How is that supposed to work and where is that 'sshd part'? > > line 1 and 3 - the "nice name", lin

Re: Native upstart scripts – implemented

2010-05-09 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On Sunday 09 May 2010 12:00:57 Jacek Konieczny wrote: > I guess  --no-wait for emit should be used here. Though there is > something blocking – emit waits for some action on the 'started' event > to finish and some service starting on this even has probably locked up > (most probably due to https:/

Re: Native upstart scripts – implemented

2010-05-09 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On Sunday 09 May 2010 12:00:57 Jacek Konieczny wrote: > > also seems the "nice service name" is lost there (see sshd part). > > How is that supposed to work and where is that 'sshd part'? line 1 and 3 - the "nice name", line 4 "plain service name" 1: * Reloading OpenSSH service...

Re: Native upstart scripts – implemented

2010-05-09 Thread Jacek Konieczny
On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 11:39:14AM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > On Friday 07 May 2010 16:33:21 Jacek Konieczny wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Your volunteer has done his job :) > > seems there's some deadlock with initctl emiting Isn't that another result of https://bugs.launchpad.net/upstart/+bug/40

Re: Native upstart scripts – implemented

2010-05-09 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On Friday 07 May 2010 16:33:21 Jacek Konieczny wrote: > Hello, > > Your volunteer has done his job :) seems there's some deadlock with initctl emiting also seems the "nice service name" is lost there (see sshd part). also seems there's no our typical restart service after package upgrade, if you

Re: Native upstart scripts – implemented

2010-05-09 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On Sunday 09 May 2010 09:57:57 Jacek Konieczny wrote: > On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 02:52:57AM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > > i'd rather avoid completely the new subpackage here, if needed move > > the /etc/init dir to filesystem package to avoid dirdeps pulling upstart, > > and use conflicts tag for

Re: packages: util-linux-ng/util-linux-ng.spec - manfiles fix for ramsizerdevro...

2010-05-09 Thread Jakub Bogusz
On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 02:54:22AM +0200, glen wrote: > Author: glen Date: Sun May 9 00:54:22 2010 GMT > Module: packages Tag: HEAD > Log message: > - manfiles fix for ramsizerdevrootflagsvidmode pages on non-intels > > Files affected: > pack