On Tuesday 08 of June 2010, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Icedtea6 build failed again on the i486 builder…
>
> Any idea why it fails?
x86_64 kernel and 64bit values inside? No idea, just guessing.
> How did we manage to do previous builds?
--without bootstrap worked
>
> Greets,
>
Hi,
Icedtea6 build failed again on the i486 builder…
Any idea why it fails? How did we manage to do previous builds?
Greets,
Jacek
> icedtea6.spec (HEAD): FAILED
>
> --- icedtea6.spec:HEAD:
> Build-Time: user:1139.25s sys:71.92s real:1616.11s (faults io:6699
> non-io:13223771)
[...]
On Monday 07 June 2010 15:50:26 Caleb Maclennan wrote:
> How does this information apply to packages such as open-iscsi which
> has a release of 0.%{subver}.%{rel}
in such packages the fractional vs non-fractional is accounted from %{rel}
macro, not the real Release tag. (also older %{_rel} is su
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 02:59:12PM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> On Monday 07 of June 2010, Caleb Maclennan wrote:
> > 2010/6/7 pawelz :
> > How does this information apply to packages such as open-iscsi which
> > has a release of 0.%{subver}.%{rel} where subver is from the upstream
> > pro
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 11:44:22PM +0200, Paweł Zuzelski wrote:
> Is it problem with ekg2 or with zlib? How to fix it? Can anyone
> point me to example patch/solution in some other package?
Upgrade to zlib-1.2.5-3 (with qboosh's proper fix to my 'fix').
--
adamg
___
On Monday 07 of June 2010, Caleb Maclennan wrote:
> 2010/6/7 pawelz :
> > + Fractional release (0.1, 0.5, 3.14 etc) means package is not yet
> > ready to + be sent to builders. If you think that package is ready to
> > be build, + increase release to the next integer.
>
> How does this infor
2010/6/7 pawelz :
> + Fractional release (0.1, 0.5, 3.14 etc) means package is not yet ready to
> + be sent to builders. If you think that package is ready to be build,
> + increase release to the next integer.
How does this information apply to packages such as open-iscsi which
has a releas
On Monday 07 of June 2010, Caleb Maclennan wrote:
> 2010/6/6 arekm
>
> > Author: arekmDate: Sun Jun 6 15:36:42 2010 GMT
> > Module: packages Tag: HEAD
> > Log message:
> > - release 5
> >
> > Files affected:
> > packages/perl-Clutter-GStrea
2010/6/6 arekm
>
> Author: arekm Date: Sun Jun 6 15:36:42 2010 GMT
> Module: packages Tag: HEAD
> Log message:
> - release 5
>
> Files affected:
> packages/perl-Clutter-GStreamer:
> perl-Clutter-GStreamer.spec (1.3 -> 1.4)
Why did the rel g
On Saturday 05 of June 2010, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> New PLD RescueCD is hopefuly to be produced at the end of this month but
> areq needs help with fixing packages.
>
> Current set of problems is at:
>
> http://pld.areq.eu.org/th-i486h/problems/
List/logs updated.
--
Arkadiusz Miśkiewic
10 matches
Mail list logo
