On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 01:27:57AM +0200, Paweł Zuzelski wrote:
I'm using such a oneliner for finding python deps.
I know that it is a bit hackish, but maybe it is possible to
use it to write autodeps script for python libs?
Much better idea would be to use the dependency information already
On Monday 07 of June 2010, Caleb Maclennan wrote:
2010/6/6 arekm ar...@pld-linux.org
Author: arekmDate: Sun Jun 6 15:36:42 2010 GMT
Module: packages Tag: HEAD
Log message:
- release 5
Files affected:
On Monday 07 of June 2010, Caleb Maclennan wrote:
2010/6/7 pawelz paw...@pld-linux.org:
+ Fractional release (0.1, 0.5, 3.14 etc) means package is not yet
ready to + be sent to builders. If you think that package is ready to
be build, + increase release to the next integer.
How
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 11:44:22PM +0200, Paweł Zuzelski wrote:
Is it problem with ekg2 or with zlib? How to fix it? Can anyone
point me to example patch/solution in some other package?
Upgrade to zlib-1.2.5-3 (with qboosh's proper fix to my 'fix').
--
adamg
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 02:59:12PM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
On Monday 07 of June 2010, Caleb Maclennan wrote:
2010/6/7 pawelz paw...@pld-linux.org:
How does this information apply to packages such as open-iscsi which
has a release of 0.%{subver}.%{rel} where subver is from the
On Monday 07 June 2010 15:50:26 Caleb Maclennan wrote:
How does this information apply to packages such as open-iscsi which
has a release of 0.%{subver}.%{rel}
in such packages the fractional vs non-fractional is accounted from %{rel}
macro, not the real Release tag. (also older %{_rel} is