Re: rpm.groups - Libraries/Ruby

2010-06-24 Thread Jeff Johnson
On Jun 24, 2010, at 11:22 AM, Bartosz Taudul wrote: >>> New group hierarchy proposition can be found at >>> http://cvs.pld-linux.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/PLD-doc/nowe-grupy?rev=HEAD. >> This tree is as good as any other I've seen, certainly far far >> better than synaptic/aptitude choices. > It was bas

Re: rpm.groups - Libraries/Ruby

2010-06-24 Thread Bartosz Taudul
>> New group hierarchy proposition can be found at >> http://cvs.pld-linux.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/PLD-doc/nowe-grupy?rev=HEAD. > This tree is as good as any other I've seen, certainly far far > better than synaptic/aptitude choices. It was based on sourceforge trove software map. > Have you considered

Re: rpm.groups - Libraries/Ruby

2010-06-24 Thread Jeff Johnson
On Jun 24, 2010, at 9:42 AM, Bartosz Taudul wrote: > 2010/6/24 Jeff Johnson : >>> Why do we care about RPM groups? >> What else would we discuss if RPMTAG_GROUP did not exist? > I was referring to the general shit state of the group hierarchy in > PLD. Basically 90% of the stuff is in Application

Re: rpm.groups - Libraries/Ruby

2010-06-24 Thread Jeff Johnson
On Jun 24, 2010, at 10:11 AM, Artur Wroblewski wrote: > 2010/6/24 Jeff Johnson : >> >> On Jun 24, 2010, at 9:36 AM, Paweł Zuzelski wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 24 Jun 2010, Jeff Johnson wrote: > [...] Did Poland do well in South Africa? >>> >>> Not so bad, we have not lost any game yet. >>> >>

Re: rpm.groups - Libraries/Ruby

2010-06-24 Thread Artur Wroblewski
2010/6/24 Jeff Johnson : > > On Jun 24, 2010, at 9:36 AM, Paweł Zuzelski wrote: > >> On Thu, 24 Jun 2010, Jeff Johnson wrote: [...] >>> Did Poland do well in South Africa? >> >> Not so bad, we have not lost any game yet. >> > > Lots of ties eh? ;-) No ties, it is just impossible for us to loose. :

Re: rpm.groups - Libraries/Ruby

2010-06-24 Thread Jeff Johnson
On Jun 24, 2010, at 9:42 AM, Bartosz Taudul wrote: > 2010/6/24 Jeff Johnson : >>> Why do we care about RPM groups? >> What else would we discuss if RPMTAG_GROUP did not exist? > I was referring to the general shit state of the group hierarchy in > PLD. Basically 90% of the stuff is in Application

Re: rpm.groups - Libraries/Ruby

2010-06-24 Thread Jeff Johnson
On Jun 24, 2010, at 9:36 AM, Paweł Zuzelski wrote: > On Thu, 24 Jun 2010, Jeff Johnson wrote: >> What else would we discuss if RPMTAG_GROUP did not exist? > > Sorry, I don't get it. > Translation from obscure jbj-speak: RPMTAG_GROUP is utterly broken as a "package" metadata ite

Re: rpm.groups - Libraries/Ruby

2010-06-24 Thread Bartosz Taudul
2010/6/24 Jeff Johnson : >> Why do we care about RPM groups? > What else would we discuss if RPMTAG_GROUP did not exist? I was referring to the general shit state of the group hierarchy in PLD. Basically 90% of the stuff is in Applications or X11/Applications, which makes the groups completly usele

Re: rpm.groups - Libraries/Ruby

2010-06-24 Thread Paweł Zuzelski
On Thu, 24 Jun 2010, Jeff Johnson wrote: > What else would we discuss if RPMTAG_GROUP did not exist? Sorry, I don't get it. > Did Poland do well in South Africa? Not so bad, we have not lost any game yet. -- Regards, Paweł Zuzelski ___ pld-devel-en m

Re: rpm.groups - Libraries/Ruby

2010-06-24 Thread Jeff Johnson
On Jun 24, 2010, at 7:31 AM, Bartosz Taudul wrote: > 2010/6/24 Paweł Zuzelski : >> Any comments? > Why do we care about RPM groups? > What else would we discuss if RPMTAG_GROUP did not exist? Did Poland do well in South Africa? 73 de Jeff ___ pld-de

Re: rpm.groups - Libraries/Ruby

2010-06-24 Thread Bartosz Taudul
2010/6/24 Paweł Zuzelski : > Any comments? Why do we care about RPM groups? wolf ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

rpm.groups - Libraries/Ruby

2010-06-24 Thread Paweł Zuzelski
Proposition: let's add new groups for ruby packages: Libraries/Ruby Development/Languages/Ruby Any comments? -- Regards, Paweł Zuzelski ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/