tar BR

2010-07-14 Thread Zsolt Udvari
Hi all! Is this needed to add tar BR some packages? E.g. http://cvs.pld-linux.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/packages/awesome/awesome.spec.diff?r1=1.91;r2=1.92 http://cvs.pld-linux.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/packages/texlive/texlive.spec.diff?r1=1.324;r2=1.325 Etc. On carme: poldek:/all-avail uninstall -t

Re: tar BR

2010-07-14 Thread Paweł Zuzelski
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010, Zsolt Udvari wrote: So rpm-build{,-tools} requires tar, so IMHO the tar BR is unneeded. You can skip BR if it is required by rpm-build. But if it is required only by rpm-build-tools you still need BR. poldek:/all-avail desc -r rpm-build | grep tar --color warn: rpm-build:

Re: tar BR

2010-07-14 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On Wednesday 14 July 2010 12:36:34 Paweł Zuzelski wrote: On Wed, 14 Jul 2010, Zsolt Udvari wrote: So rpm-build{,-tools} requires tar, so IMHO the tar BR is unneeded. You can skip BR if it is required by rpm-build. But if it is required only by rpm-build-tools you still need BR. ... So you

Re: tar BR

2010-07-14 Thread Przemyslaw Iskra
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 02:08:19PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: On Wednesday 14 July 2010 12:36:34 Paweł Zuzelski wrote: On Wed, 14 Jul 2010, Zsolt Udvari wrote: So rpm-build{,-tools} requires tar, so IMHO the tar BR is unneeded. one is BR: tar, other is VERSIONED BR: tar ^ - that's the

Re: tar BR

2010-07-14 Thread Zsolt Udvari
one is BR: tar, other is VERSIONED BR: tar ^ - that's the reason Oh, ok, understand :) ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en