Re: python3.2+ compiled files

2011-05-19 Thread Jakub Bogusz
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 06:08:31PM +0100, Artur Wroblewski wrote: > There is also > >http://web.archiveorange.com/archive/v/jA6s9GD0sh2vKRhR2zat > > to study. > > We could also think about zipping of the modules later... > > Anyway, if no one objects then I will finish packaging of Python 3

Re: python3.2+ compiled files

2011-05-19 Thread Artur Wroblewski
There is also http://web.archiveorange.com/archive/v/jA6s9GD0sh2vKRhR2zat to study. We could also think about zipping of the modules later... Anyway, if no one objects then I will finish packaging of Python 3.2 during the weekend using source files and __pycache__. Is that OK? Regards, w

Re: python3.2+ compiled files

2011-05-19 Thread Artur Wroblewski
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Jakub Bogusz wrote: [...] > So we have to decide how to package python distribution (and possibly > all python3 modules, if distutils use __pycache__ too) - there are > two solutions: > > - package all modules in source form together with __pycache__ >  subdirectori