Re: python3.2+ compiled files

2011-05-21 Thread Artur Wroblewski
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Jacek Konieczny wrote: > On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 12:22:04PM +0100, Artur Wroblewski wrote: >> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Jacek Konieczny wrote: >> > Maybe we should have some automation for packaging (or not >> > packaging) __pycache__ and its contents? So

Re: python3.2+ compiled files

2011-05-21 Thread Artur Wroblewski
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Artur Wroblewski wrote: [...] > Anyway, if no one objects then I will finish packaging of Python 3.2 > during the weekend using source files and __pycache__. Done. I have upgraded few packages, too. Some of them are not done in nice way (i.e. python3 vs. python2

Re: python3.2+ compiled files

2011-05-21 Thread Jacek Konieczny
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 12:22:04PM +0100, Artur Wroblewski wrote: > On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Jacek Konieczny wrote: > > Maybe we should have some automation for packaging (or not > > packaging) __pycache__ and its contents? So it doesn't have to be listed > > explicitly for every python p

Re: python3.2+ compiled files

2011-05-21 Thread Artur Wroblewski
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Jacek Konieczny wrote: > Maybe we should have some automation for packaging (or not > packaging) __pycache__ and its contents? So it doesn't have to be listed > explicitly for every python package. I am thinking about something like > %find_lang – e.g. %find_pybyt