On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 03:12:11PM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> On Tuesday 31 of May 2011, Tomasz Pala wrote:
> > On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 19:53:52 +0200, Tomasz Pala wrote:
> > >> No one was brave enough to rebuild all dependencies on ftp.pld- which
> > >> would be required if la were dropp
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 19:45:53 +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> No one was brave enough to rebuild all dependencies on ftp.pld- which would
> be
> required if la were dropped.
I did some initial changes, especially rebuilded libxkbui with stripped
libxkbfile - or tried to, because BR: xor
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 15:12:11 +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
>> So basically every *.la file that can be safely removed (packages with
>> *.pc) and is not required by any package we got might be removed without
>> any rebuilds? I mean - if some outer la file was polluted it would be
>> seen
On Tuesday 31 of May 2011, Tomasz Pala wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 19:53:52 +0200, Tomasz Pala wrote:
> >> No one was brave enough to rebuild all dependencies on ftp.pld- which
> >> would be required if la were dropped.
>
> So basically every *.la file that can be safely removed (packages wit
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 19:53:52 +0200, Tomasz Pala wrote:
>> No one was brave enough to rebuild all dependencies on ftp.pld- which would
>> be
>> required if la were dropped.
So basically every *.la file that can be safely removed (packages with
*.pc) and is not required by any package we got
