Re: kernel for PLD AC

2012/1/30 Elan Ruusamäe > On 30.01.2012 07:37, Marcin Rybak wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> does anybody have kernel for PLD AC newer than 2.6.27.57-1? Of course I >> mean stable and buildable for i686. Thanks in advance for .spec, source >> rpm, builded i686 or link to CVS revision which works at AC (the

Re: kernel for PLD AC

On 30.01.2012 07:37, Marcin Rybak wrote: Hi, does anybody have kernel for PLD AC newer than 2.6.27.57-1? Of course I mean stable and buildable for i686. Thanks in advance for .spec, source rpm, builded i686 or link to CVS revision which works at AC (the AC-Branch points to 2.6.16, but in ac-upda

kernel for PLD AC

Hi, does anybody have kernel for PLD AC newer than 2.6.27.57-1? Of course I mean stable and buildable for i686. Thanks in advance for .spec, source rpm, builded i686 or link to CVS revision which works at AC (the AC-Branch points to 2.6.16, but in ac-updates 2.6.27 is avaliable) Thanks for help (

Re: flaws in xinitrc-ng

On 01/30/2012 12:17 AM, Tomasz Pala wrote: > for first problem, make all -x scripts executed, not sourced? If you want to execute some code, just create #!sh script with proper commands and source it. That's the same rule we follow for many other scripts using sth.d for config inclusion (e.g. l

Re: packages: synergy/synergy-client.init - do not use exit in xinitrc, use ret...

On 01/29/2012 11:35 PM, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote: On Sunday 29 of January 2012, glen wrote: Author: glen Date: Sun Jan 29 21:09:23 2012 GMT Module: packages Tag: HEAD Log message: - do not use exit in xinitrc, use return instead Files aff

Re: flaws in xinitrc-ng

On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 16:58:33 +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > 78# Run all system xinitrc shell scripts. > 79for i in /etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc.d/* ; do > 80if [ -x "$i" ]; then > 81. "$i" > 82fi > 83done > > this code has several flaws: > > 1

Re: polkits

On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 23:13:41 +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > what's the difference PolicyKit vs polkit? PK was to be obsoleted by polkit a long time ago... > both are available from th, neither seem to obsolete each other ...so polkit should, unless something had changed since then. > $ rpm

Re: packages: synergy/synergy-client.init - do not use exit in xinitrc, use ret...

On Sunday 29 of January 2012, glen wrote: > Author: glen Date: Sun Jan 29 21:09:23 2012 GMT > Module: packages Tag: HEAD > Log message: > - do not use exit in xinitrc, use return instead > > Files affected: > packages/synergy: >synergy-cli

polkits

what's the difference PolicyKit vs polkit? both are available from th, neither seem to obsolete each other funnily, PolicyKit URL is polkit and polkit URL is PolicyKit :) $ rpm -qi PolicyKit Name: PolicyKitRelocations: (not relocatable) Version : 0.9

Re: flaws in xinitrc-ng

On Sun, 29 Jan 2012, Jacek Konieczny wrote: > On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 04:58:33PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > > how to proceed here? > > for first problem, make all -x scripts executed, not sourced? > > Aren't the scripts supposed to set session environment in different > ways? Running them in a

Re: flaws in xinitrc-ng

On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 04:58:33PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > how to proceed here? > for first problem, make all -x scripts executed, not sourced? Aren't the scripts supposed to set session environment in different ways? Running them in a subprocess won't help in this task… Greets, Jac

Re: flaws in xinitrc-ng

On Sun, 29 Jan 2012, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > hi > > our latest and greatest release > http://svn.pld-linux.org/trac/svn/browser/xinitrc-ng/trunk/xinitdefs?annotate=blame&rev=12296 > >

flaws in xinitrc-ng

hi our latest and greatest release http://svn.pld-linux.org/trac/svn/browser/xinitrc-ng/trunk/xinitdefs?annotate=blame&rev=12296

Re: big move comming

On 01/28/2012 03:55 PM, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote: gnome-applets-3.2.1-1.src.rpm.info what triggered this removal, don't see any reason from pastebin log php-pecl-haru-1.0.0-3.src.rpm.info rebuild should be in th-test -- glen ___ pld-devel-en mail