Re: gimp 2.8.0 rc1, gimp plugins

2012-04-19 Thread Bartosz Świątek
W dniu 20 kwietnia 2012 01:03 użytkownik Artur Wroblewski napisał: > On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Caleb Maclennan wrote: >> 2012/4/19 Artur Wroblewski : >>> hi, >>> >>> i would like to move gimp 2.8.0 rc1 from DEVEL to HEAD. >>> >>> any argument against? >>> >>> btw. we have some quite old gi

Re: gimp 2.8.0 rc1, gimp plugins

2012-04-19 Thread Artur Wroblewski
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Caleb Maclennan wrote: > 2012/4/19 Artur Wroblewski : >> hi, >> >> i would like to move gimp 2.8.0 rc1 from DEVEL to HEAD. >> >> any argument against? >> >> btw. we have some quite old gimp plugins on ftp, i.e. build in 2010, 2009. >> shall >> they be removed, reb

Re: gimp 2.8.0 rc1, gimp plugins

2012-04-19 Thread Artur Wroblewski
2012/4/19 Bartosz Świątek : > W dniu 19 kwietnia 2012 21:32 użytkownik Artur Wroblewski > napisał: >> hi, >> >> i would like to move gimp 2.8.0 rc1 from DEVEL to HEAD. >> >> any argument against? > > Yes. New gegl and babl break API/ABI compatibility with earlier > versions. Gimp 2.8 RC1 needs the

Re: gimp 2.8.0 rc1, gimp plugins

2012-04-19 Thread Caleb Maclennan
2012/4/19 Artur Wroblewski : > hi, > > i would like to move gimp 2.8.0 rc1 from DEVEL to HEAD. > > any argument against? > > btw. we have some quite old gimp plugins on ftp, i.e. build in 2010, 2009. > shall > they be removed, rebuilt? > > regards, > > w Yes. That is an RC for a major release ver

Re: gimp 2.8.0 rc1, gimp plugins

2012-04-19 Thread Bartosz Świątek
W dniu 19 kwietnia 2012 21:32 użytkownik Artur Wroblewski napisał: > hi, > > i would like to move gimp 2.8.0 rc1 from DEVEL to HEAD. > > any argument against? Yes. New gegl and babl break API/ABI compatibility with earlier versions. Gimp 2.8 RC1 needs them. Also as statet on gimp.org, they need t

gimp 2.8.0 rc1, gimp plugins

2012-04-19 Thread Artur Wroblewski
hi, i would like to move gimp 2.8.0 rc1 from DEVEL to HEAD. any argument against? btw. we have some quite old gimp plugins on ftp, i.e. build in 2010, 2009. shall they be removed, rebuilt? regards, w ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.p

Re: packages: babl/babl.spec - ver. 0.1.8 (nfy - builds without vala 0.16 and w...

2012-04-19 Thread Jakub Bogusz
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 07:18:15PM +0100, Artur Wroblewski wrote: > On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 02:06:26AM +0200, wrobell wrote: > >>  BuildRequires:       autoconf >= 2.54 > >>  BuildRequires:       automake >= 1:1.11 > >> +BuildRequires: