On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:04:39AM +0200, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 09:55:31AM +0200, Kacper Kornet wrote:
> > Someone on IRC suggested that name. I think it was a compromise between
> > slug, and git-core-pld. The connection with git is that instead of
> > calling command sl
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 09:55:31AM +0200, Kacper Kornet wrote:
> Someone on IRC suggested that name. I think it was a compromise between
> slug, and git-core-pld. The connection with git is that instead of
> calling command slug.py , you can use 'git pld
> '.
But still, a plugin to git is not a
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 09:43:17AM +0200, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 03:36:56AM +0200, draenog wrote:
> > Files affected:
> > packages/git-core-slug:
> >git-core-slug.spec (1.18 -> 1.19)
> Why is this package called 'git-core-slug'? It is not in any way part of
> th
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 03:36:56AM +0200, draenog wrote:
> Files affected:
> packages/git-core-slug:
>git-core-slug.spec (1.18 -> 1.19)
Why is this package called 'git-core-slug'? It is not in any way part of
the GIT core, is it? Wouldn't 'git-slug' or just 'slug' or 'pld-slug' be
better
