2012/9/4 Jan Rękorajski :
> On Tue, 04 Sep 2012, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday 04 of September 2012, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> > After making a snapshot, and having (development wise) stable package set,
>> > I want to start refreshing the distribution. This means big changes
On Tue, 04 Sep 2012, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 of September 2012, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
> > Hi,
> > After making a snapshot, and having (development wise) stable package set,
> > I want to start refreshing the distribution. This means big changes in the
> > near future to get PLD
On Tuesday 04 of September 2012, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
> Hi,
> After making a snapshot, and having (development wise) stable package set,
> I want to start refreshing the distribution. This means big changes in the
> near future to get PLD back to being modern (or at least up-to-date) wrt
> current
On Tue, 04 Sep 2012, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 12:20:56PM +0200, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
> > - rpm 5.4.x
>
> Yeah!
> +1
>
> And we should re-consider every of our current rpm patches, even if some
> functionality should be sacrificed.
I went through all the patches on mast
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 12:20:56PM +0200, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
> - rpm 5.4.x
Yeah!
+1
And we should re-consider every of our current rpm patches, even if some
functionality should be sacrificed.
> - full systemd support (provide systemd units, but still support SysV
> scripts - at lea
Hi,
After making a snapshot, and having (development wise) stable package set,
I want to start refreshing the distribution. This means big changes in the
near future to get PLD back to being modern (or at least up-to-date) wrt
current Linux world.
Below I present a plan (a.k.a The Roadmap) for Th
