On Friday 05 of October 2012 16:05:16 Kacper Kornet wrote:
> Recently one email to pld-cvs was blocked due to large size of generated
> diff. The "offending" file was gcc-branch.diff from crossmingw64-gcc
> which is 11M.
>
> Does this file include and PLD specific changes or is it just a diff
> be
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 03:49:51PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 05:46:52PM +0200, Kacper Kornet wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 05:10:32PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> > > On 10.09.2012 20:45, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> > > >On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 10:08:36PM +0200, Jakub Bog
Recently one email to pld-cvs was blocked due to large size of generated
diff. The "offending" file was gcc-branch.diff from crossmingw64-gcc
which is 11M.
Does this file include and PLD specific changes or is it just a diff
between released version and tip of branch in some foreign (not PLD)
repo
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 05:46:52PM +0200, Kacper Kornet wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 05:10:32PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> > On 10.09.2012 20:45, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> > >On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 10:08:36PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> > >>>What is the procedure to rename already existing (al
You need to generate HAVE_KRB5_GET_INIT_CREDS_OPT_SET_OUT_CCACHE
definition in configure, or you may get unpredictable results if you
ever build it with MIT ;)
On Fri, 05 Oct 2012, kiesiu wrote:
> commit e23087188dce0c74833f4c3d480316509a6f819e
> Author: Łukasz Kieś
> Date: Fri Oct 5 14:40:24
