Re: Large patches in git repositories

2012-10-16 Thread Kacper Kornet
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:21:03AM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > On 09/10/12 04:52, Kacper Kornet wrote: > >In my opinion a better idea is to keep in a package a script that > >generates the compressed patch,pushes it to dropin and updates > ># Patch-md5: > go on with this, and block huge patches f

Re: rpm5 package verification and md5sum of config files

2012-10-16 Thread Adam Osuchowski
Jan Rękorajski wrote: > I'm afraid your patch doesn't work for me, I'm still getting bad md5 > for config files: > > $ rpm -V wget > ..5. c /etc/wgetrc > > Am I missing something? Hmmm, I don't know. Maybe I changed something else during debugging and forgot about it. Give me some time, I w

Re: rpm5 package verification and md5sum of config files

2012-10-16 Thread Jan Rękorajski
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012, Adam Osuchowski wrote: > Jan Rękorajski wrote: > > Adam, which bug is fixed by your 1-liner? > > The original one: rpm shows bad md5 digest of files marked as > `%verify(no md5)' (config files) although they are not modified. I'm afraid your patch doesn't work for me, I'm st

Re: rpm5 package verification and md5sum of config files

2012-10-16 Thread Jeffrey Johnson
On Oct 16, 2012, at 2:37 AM, Jan Rękorajski wrote: > > The confusion here is because Adam found a second bug during duscussion > here, so it happened to be two reports mixed, the one above > and the '--nofdigests' option breakage - if you add this > option then rpm5 reports _all_ files as havin

Re: rpm5 package verification and md5sum of config files

2012-10-16 Thread Jeffrey Johnson
On Oct 16, 2012, at 2:57 AM, Adam Osuchowski wrote: > > FYI, I don't claim that my 1-liner is the best solution for first case. > I only find it helps. Maybe there is more suitable one. Actually your 1-liner deletion *is* the best patch. (aside) I dimly remember having to debug this issue. Be