Re: What's the matter with the current chromium-browser?

2013-06-06 Thread Łukasz Maśko
Dnia piątek, 7 czerwca 2013 00:56:00 Elan Ruusamäe pisze: > On 06.06.2013 17:31, Łukasz Maśko wrote: > > I cannot run the last 2 versions (27.0.1453.{93,110}-1). Both behave in > > the > > same way - one of the subprocesses dies somewhere in the meantime, while > > others do not notice it and wait

Re: th-test: apache 2.4

2013-06-06 Thread Jan Rękorajski
On Tue, 28 May 2013, Jan Rękorajski wrote: > On Wed, 10 Apr 2013, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > New apache 2.4 is arriving to th-test. > > > > Please test and share with upgrade results (there are triggers that convert > > configuration etc but likely miss some cases). >

Re: What's the matter with the current chromium-browser?

2013-06-06 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On 06.06.2013 17:31, Łukasz Maśko wrote: I cannot run the last 2 versions (27.0.1453.{93,110}-1). Both behave in the same way - one of the subprocesses dies somewhere in the meantime, while others do not notice it and wait forever for response (msgrecv(), in strace). Furthermore, in dmesg I can f

Re: What's the matter with the current chromium-browser?

2013-06-06 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On 06.06.2013 17:31, Łukasz Maśko wrote: Also versions higher than 24.0.1312.56-1 cannot login to my Chrome account (26.0.1410.63-1 works, but reports problems with logging into google account and advices to reauthenticate, but then it is exactly the same). Only the already mentioned old version

What's the matter with the current chromium-browser?

2013-06-06 Thread Łukasz Maśko
I cannot run the last 2 versions (27.0.1453.{93,110}-1). Both behave in the same way - one of the subprocesses dies somewhere in the meantime, while others do not notice it and wait forever for response (msgrecv(), in strace). Furthermore, in dmesg I can find general protection errors: [ 199.0

Re: Fwd: ERRORS: xbelld.spec

2013-06-06 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On 06.06.2013 12:03, Łukasz Głębicki wrote: >Possibly you have gold by default, it seems to work slightly different. No, it is gcc with ccache, but without ccache, there is no difference. I tested with gcc from main and from test. Can you build it by yourself on gcc and check if you have simila

Re: Fwd: ERRORS: xbelld.spec

2013-06-06 Thread Łukasz Głębicki
Dnia 2013-06-06 09:47 Jakub Bogusz napisał(a): >On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 04:40:09PM +0200, Lukasz Glebicki wrote: >> Why this package is not able to link on builders? > >With as-needed libraries must appear in link command after objects which use them. >> I suppose a flag "--as-needed", but my pe

Re: Fwd: ERRORS: xbelld.spec

2013-06-06 Thread Jakub Bogusz
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 04:40:09PM +0200, Lukasz Glebicki wrote: > Why this package is not able to link on builders? With as-needed libraries must appear in link command after objects which use them. > I suppose a flag "--as-needed", but my personal builder, which is up to date, > can build thi