Re: [packages/samba4] - all samba/vfs modules belong to samba3 exclusively; samba4 uses different ntvfs interface

2013-12-31 Thread Jakub Bogusz
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 07:32:27PM +0100, Jan Rękorajski wrote: > On Tue, 31 Dec 2013, qboosh wrote: > > > commit 2948c518df0a1cdc2672a30e14a7138de4b0a5bc > > Author: Jakub Bogusz > > Date: Tue Dec 31 19:26:50 2013 +0100 > > > > - all samba/vfs modules belong to samba3 exclusively; samba4

Re: Th 2013 snapshot released

2013-12-31 Thread Aria Stewart
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 09:36:40PM +0100, Jan Rękorajski wrote: > As promised I made a new snapshot of the PLD Th line. > See the announcment on http://www.pld-linux.org/ for details. And there was much rejoicing! pgpnomAo9lO0V.pgp Description: PGP signature _

Th 2013 snapshot released

2013-12-31 Thread Jan Rękorajski
As promised I made a new snapshot of the PLD Th line. See the announcment on http://www.pld-linux.org/ for details. Happy New Year Everyone! -- Jan Rękorajski | PLD/Linux SysAdm | http://www.pld-linux.org/ bagginsmimuw.edu.p

Re: [packages/samba4] - all samba/vfs modules belong to samba3 exclusively; samba4 uses different ntvfs interface

2013-12-31 Thread Jan Rękorajski
On Tue, 31 Dec 2013, qboosh wrote: > commit 2948c518df0a1cdc2672a30e14a7138de4b0a5bc > Author: Jakub Bogusz > Date: Tue Dec 31 19:26:50 2013 +0100 > > - all samba/vfs modules belong to samba3 exclusively; samba4 uses > different ntvfs interface Oh, you are so wrong. Revert this commit. D

GRUB2 – should we use a recent snapshot?

2013-12-31 Thread Jacek Konieczny
Hi, The grub 2.00 release is buggy and lacking features. And their release cycle is ridiculous – 2.00 was released in June 2012, lots of fixes were commited to their repository, but no new release was made. We have some patches from Fedora. I have been trying to fix bugs by back-porting patches f