On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 20:22:01 +0100, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
> If we have i686 arch we need to support i686 CPUs, not a random subset.
We don't "need" to do anything. SSE2 is 13 years old now (and available
for 11 years in AMD), I haven't seen unsupported CPUs in years.
Hardware produced in tha
On Mon, 29 Dec 2014, Andrzej Zawadzki wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I need help: what configure option should I use according to:
> www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/uuid-ossp.html
>
>
> With --with-uuid=ossp
>
> configure: WARNING: uuid.h: accepted by the compiler, rejected by the
> preprocessor!
> con
On Tue, 30 Dec 2014, Tomasz Pala wrote:
> +1 to abandoning i486 in current state (keeping last packages on FTP).
>
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 21:48:03 +0100, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
>
> >> Specifically:
> >>Can RPM assume sse2 instructions and optimize digests/crypto to use
> >> sse2?
> >
> >
+1 to abandoning i486 in current state (keeping last packages on FTP).
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 21:48:03 +0100, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
>> Specifically:
>> Can RPM assume sse2 instructions and optimize digests/crypto to use
>> sse2?
>
> No 32bit AMD CPU has this. So, no, you can't do it uncon
