On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 01:57:59 +0100, Tomasz Pala wrote:
> My point is - assuming I haven't forgot about anything (considering my last
> mail
> about versioned symbols) we could safely:
>
> 1. compile samba against heimdal to have AD (as an exception!),
> 2. compile everything else against MIT
On Sun, Feb 08, 2015 at 11:36:42 +0100, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
>> > But that's not the point, you missed the most important issue (system
>> > MIT makes samba4 useless):
>
> APIs and ABIs in Heimdal and MIT are different. Samba uses Heimdal to do
> AD DC kerberos. It does not build with MIT. Fedor
On Sun, Feb 08, 2015 at 11:41:41 +0100, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
>> problem in having them both on ftp? Client libraries should be
>> compatible (i.e. heimdal client works with MIT server, that's the point
>> of having a 'protocol'). Incompatible parts are kadmin and probably
>> the rest of server st
