Re: [packages/microcode-data-intel] - rel 2; produce single file that can be used by grub

2017-09-09 Thread Tomasz Pala
On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 20:20:17 +0200, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote: > The only reason I could imagine is to manually generate microcode files from > manually download tarball from intel.com. There's no reason to do that ...provided we ship updates ASAP. But since we might be late, someone might

Re: [packages/firefox] - move lang to main package

2017-09-09 Thread Jan Rękorajski
On Sat, 09 Sep 2017, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > On 02.09.2017 18:01, baggins wrote: > > - move lang to main package > > why do you still create commits not explain intentions? > > > so question: "why?" Isn't it obvious? a) the split itself was artificial, due to rpm deficiencies at that

Re: [packages/microcode-data-intel] - rel 2; produce single file that can be used by grub

2017-09-09 Thread Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
On Saturday 09 of September 2017, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > On 04.09.2017 10:14, arekm wrote: > > +cp -p intel-microcode2ucode-single $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sbindir} > > what is the point of packaging the binaries that are used just to build > this package? > > not packaging those can make whole package