W dniu 2021-05-15 o 15:26, Neal Gompa pisze:
On Sat, May 15, 2021 at 6:23 AM Adam Gołębiowski wrote:
W dniu 2021-05-15 o 11:52, Neal Gompa pisze:
On Sat, May 15, 2021 at 5:38 AM Adam Gołębiowski wrote:
W dniu 2021-05-13 o 21:32, Elan Ruusamäe pisze:
point of that guard was to wait for
W dniu 2021-05-15 o 11:52, Neal Gompa pisze:
On Sat, May 15, 2021 at 5:38 AM Adam Gołębiowski wrote:
W dniu 2021-05-13 o 21:32, Elan Ruusamäe pisze:
point of that guard was to wait for support to become available or
someone implement a solution.
(...)
but as no such solution as provided
W dniu 2021-05-13 o 21:32, Elan Ruusamäe pisze:
point of that guard was to wait for support to become available or
someone implement a solution.
(...)
but as no such solution as provided, you need to update obsoletes to
fill **all** package names that provide that file path.
I refuse to do
Looks like we hit -ENOSPC on ftp.
There's some extra space added now, not sure if pending packages will be synced
from builders or will need to be pushed manually .
- Original Message -
From: "Jan Palus"
To: pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
Sent: wtorek, 6 sierpień 2019 0:37:29
S
W dniu 2018-11-03 11:11, Jan Rękorajski napisał(a):
The below packages will be removed from Th next week (~10th Nov) along
with any broken deps their removal will cause.
john
I will commit this one today, need to fix x32 build.
--
Adam Gołębiowski, PLD Linux
the the remaining files and will require bind-base.
+1, this approach shouldn't break systems on upgrade (bind will upgrade
to bind+bind-base),
just make sure bind-base works :)
--
Adam Gołębiowski, PLD Linux
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-
used for aliases only,
- PLD-doc:
- uid_gid.db.txt
- BuildRequires.txt
- PLD-update-TODO
+ maybe SSH-keys
So nothing much, really.
Am I missing something?
--
Adam Gołębiowski, PLD Linux
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld
ompares name ("enum.la") to "oracle" and decides
they are equal...
and if I comment this part out, it goes into infinite loop
--
Adam Gołębiowski, PLD Linux
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
W dniu 2009-11-18 04:32, Przemyslaw Iskra pisze:
> why does it ? It probably is the only way anyways, think about multiple
> kernel versions installed at once.
Honestly I didn't think of that, but in that case to avoid file
conflicts when multiple kernel*-misc-vbox* packages are installed we
sho
Krzysztof Krakowiak pisze:
> Witam,
>
> Prosze o dostep RW do CVS PLD.
> Dane do: ()
Konto założone, załóż sobie alias pocztowy dodając odpowiedni wpis do
CVSROOT/users.
[en] account created
--
http://adam.golebiowski.eu/ | Everybody needs someone sure, someone true,
PLD Linux develo
Hi there,
Due to insufficient disk space, I had to (temporary) remove iso images from
ftp4 (ftp.atm). That gave us 95 GiB of space for fast-growing Th/Ti/AIDA
repositories.
--
http://adam.golebiowski.eu/ | Everybody needs someone sure, someone true,
PLD Linux developer | Everybody need
Paweł Zuzelski pisze:
> Please rename java-portletapi10 to java-pluto.
>
> I can't provide with exact commands, beacuase I don't know how
> should they look like after CVS structure migration.
Done:
cp packages/java-portletapi10 packages/java-pluto
mv packages/java-pluto/java-{por
Patryk Zawadzki pisze:
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 12:43 AM, adamg wrote:
>> Author: adamgDate: Sat Jul 25 22:43:46 2009 GMT
>> Module: packages Tag: HEAD
>> Log message:
>> - revert part of 2.4.12 ( fixes Mesa-7.5 build )
>> - release 2
>
> Results
Elan Ruusamäe pisze:
> On Friday 08 May 2009 12:33:01 Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
>> On Sunday 03 May 2009 13:31:15 Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
>>> It's nice bit it will break in a case when you use some .src.rpm
>>> and install it. It should be installed in standard place -
>>> rpm/{SOURCES,SPECS} not i
Elan Ruusamäe pisze:
> On Friday 08 May 2009 13:27:23 Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
>> On Friday 08 May 2009 13:19:04 Tomasz Pala wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 12:33:46 +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
>> please give (at least) one sample, so i could write 404 handler in
>> apache to solve this prob
Hi,
[ad...@carme-pld-i686 SPECS]$ echo 'puts stdout "a"' | tclsh
a
Tcl_SetObjLength called with shared object
Aborted
[ad...@carme-pld-i686 SPECS]$
this causes sqlite3 build failure (and probably other software).
adamg
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pl
On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 11:24:37PM +0200, Bartosz Taudul wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 12:59:27PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> > how many out there use custom kernel anyway (i mean by that kernel
> > installed
> > without rpm package)?
> What kind of bullshit argument is it supposed to be?
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 01:37:35PM +0200, Zsolt Udvari wrote:
> Hi!
>
> fet is a free timetabling program. I hope that this spec-file is
> (almost) perfect ;)
Unfortunately, it's not -- it does not fully comply with PLD style.
There's a handy little tool, called adapter (cvs::SPECS/adapter and
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 10:59:49AM +, Zsolt Udvari wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I'm using a console-based newsreader, newsbeuter and there isn't in
> pld's repo. So I've created spec-file for newsbeuter and stfl (one of
> its depends).
I added them into CVS, thanks for the contribution.
These specs
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 12:43:25PM +0200, Mariusz Mazur wrote:
> Rationale:
> Launchpad was chosen because (a) we don't have to maintain it, (b) we don't
> have to host it (backups, whatever), (c) we don't have to develop it and (d)
> it has some nice feature for upstream integration.
hmm, as to
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 12:07:02AM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> Probably tmpwatch cleaned up /tmp where symlinks used by dropin were created.
works now.
--
http://www.mysza.eu.org/ | Everybody needs someone sure, someone true,
PLD Linux developer| Everybody needs some solid rock,
Is dropin.pld-linux.org b0rked?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ lftp -u adamg dropin.pld-linux.org
Password:
lftp [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> ls
ls: Login failed: 530 Login incorrect.
lftp [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>
I'm pretty sure I typed my password correct at least once on about 10
attempts... has anything changed r
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 09:33:36PM +0200, Marcin Krol wrote:
> > And bump epoch? Oh boy...
>
> No need to. 1.1.0 wasn't built for Titanium yet.
We'd have to if arekm rejected wine-1.1.0 (it was sent to builders).
Luckily, it's not needed.
> > You could have 1.0.0
> > in Ti, and once 1.1.x become
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 03:17:27PM +0200, Marcin Krol wrote:
> > I don't see why this can't go to Th, especially as there are beta
> > versions of kde4.
>
> I vote for moving it to DEVEL branch. Why make exception for this spec?
> It still can be built from DEVEL for Th test.
>
> If its unaccept
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 01:53:19PM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> On Saturday 28 June 2008, Adam Gołębiowski wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 01:00:54PM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> > > On Saturday 28 June 2008, adamg wrote:
> > > > Author: adamg
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 01:00:54PM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> On Saturday 28 June 2008, adamg wrote:
> > Author: adamgDate: Fri Jun 27 22:41:03 2008 GMT
> > Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD
> > Log message:
> > - updated to 1.1.0
>
>
> Develop
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 05:01:02PM +0200, Kacper Kornet wrote:
> > Author: adamgDate: Wed Jun 25 08:46:32 2008 GMT
> > Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD
> > Log message:
> > - pass --install to libtoolize (fixes build)
> > - release 2
>
> In this case s
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 12:06:49PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> to whomever has power over this. please fix!
Hmm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] says the key is being blacklisted - can you regenerate
it?
--
http://www.mysza.eu.org/ | Everybody needs someone sure, someone true,
PLD Linux developer|
Anyone knows what happened to them?
--
http://www.mysza.eu.org/ | Everybody needs someone sure, someone true,
PLD Linux developer| Everybody needs some solid rock, I know I do.
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:56:45PM +0200, wolf wrote:
> Author: wolf Date: Wed Jun 11 21:56:45 2008 GMT
> Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD
> Log message:
> - niech sobie ankry przenosi do SOURCES
>
> Files affected:
> SPECS:
>ndoc-no-warnaserror
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:00:09PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On Friday 23 May 2008 12:01:11 Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> > anyone can suggest macro name for /usr/share/php?
> >
> > %php_data_dir
> > %php_apps_dir
> > %php
>
> still nobody?
I'd use %php_data_dir, as it contains more than just (w
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 11:47:26AM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> What is 207.115.86.105?
>
> It seems to frequently download all SOURCES from different branches,
> causing locks on commits in SOURCES.
seems like SPECS/ is being locked as well...
--
http://www.mysza.eu.org/ | Everybody needs som
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 09:36:23AM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On Friday 30 May 2008 01:20, adamg wrote:
> > - vim-heavy / gvim-heavy subpackages (todo done)
>
> should we perhaps package vim from vim package as vim.ncurses and make
> symlink
> to vim and then one can replace the symlink with
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 03:24:23PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
>
> ARCHITECTURE: alpha
> sh: /home/pld/admins/ac/ftp/.tree/.stat/bin/createrepo: not found
>
> 15:22:00 pldac[pts/[EMAIL PROTECTED] SRPMS/.metadata$ ls -l
> /home/pld/admins/ac/ftp/.tree/.stat/bin/createrepo
> ls: cannot access /hom
On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 12:35:56AM +, PLD th-i686 builder wrote:
> xorg-driver-video-openchrome.spec (HEAD): OK
>
> --- xorg-driver-video-openchrome.spec:HEAD:
> upgrading packages
> Build-Time: user:35.44s sys:7.70s real:50.09s (faults io:16 non-io:1822961)
>
> Files queued for ftp:
> 12
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 06:49:50PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On Sunday 16 December 2007 17:10:04 Adam Gołębiowski wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 03:41:30PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> > > i noticed the same for ac-amd64. running upgrade command manually
> >
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 03:41:30PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> i noticed the same for ac-amd64. running upgrade command manually helped...
Hmm... what was the problem? outdated local poldek indexes or something
else?
--
http://www.mysza.eu.org/ | Everybody needs someone sure, someone true,
I am confused, kernel-xen0 / kernel-xenU was built successfully on
ac-xen (ac-athlon, ac-i686, ac-amd64) just a few hours earlier,
kernel-xen{0,U}-{smp-,}module-build is available in ac-ready, but
builders seem not to see them.
request from: adamg
started at: Sat Dec 15 11:47:22 2007
fetching
htt
Please do:
cp rpm/SPECS/eclipse-emf-sdo{,-xsd}.spec,v
thanks.
--
http://www.mysza.eu.org/ | Everybody needs someone sure, someone true,
PLD Linux developer| Everybody needs some solid rock, I know I do.
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 08:54:10PM +, PLD ac-sparc builder wrote:
> ntfs-3g.spec (HEAD): FAILED
> libfuse-devel >= 2.7.0 is needed by ntfs-3g-1.1030-1.sparc
Any reasons not to push libfuse >= 2.7.0 to ac?
--
http://www.mysza.eu.org/ | Everybody needs someone sure, someone true,
PLD
This is what I got today (fresh install, th-athlon):
/usr/bin/Xwrapper: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/xorg/modules//libfb.so:
undefined symbol: pixman_image_set_source_clipping
missing R: pixman in xorg-xserver-server? And why wasn't this dependecy
autogenerated?
--
http://www.mysza.eu.org/ |
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 07:58:26PM +, PLD ti-src builder wrote:
> gcc.spec (auto-ti-gcc-4_2_1-2): OK
maybe a separate list (pld-logs-ti?) should be set up?
--
http://www.mysza.eu.org/ | Everybody needs someone sure, someone true,
PLD Linux developer| Everybody needs some solid rock,
On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 11:18:03AM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On Sunday 09 September 2007 02:44, Adam Gołębiowski wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was thinking about apache mod_gnutls's dhfile/rsafile files being
> > generate in %post, which could be done by someth
Hi,
I was thinking about apache mod_gnutls's dhfile/rsafile files being
generate in %post, which could be done by something similiar to:
--- cut ---
%post
if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then
d=/etc/httpd/tls
[ -f "$d/dhfile" ] || /usr/bin/certtool --generate-dh-params --bits
1024 --outfile $
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 04:53:09PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> Which package is it?
It happened to me while working on apache-mod_gnutls.spec.
> I suppose it doesn't use AC_PROG_LIBTOOL if it uses apr's libtool.
exactly - configure.ac lacked AC_PROG_LIBTOOL, thanks for the hint.
--
http://w
Hi,
I'm having a problem with libtool (I guess) - it does not add --tag=CC
which causes build to fail. If I alter Makefile and add it by hand,
build passes, but then again, $DESTDIR is not taken into consideration.
No libtoolize / ac/am rebuild helps.
/usr/share/apr/build/libtool is used in thi
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 01:37:17AM +, PLD th-x86_64 builder wrote:
> openoffice.org.spec (auto-th-openoffice_org-2_2_0-oof680_m14_0_8): FAILED
>
> --- openoffice.org.spec:auto-th-openoffice_org-2_2_0-oof680_m14_0_8:
> Build-Time: user:151.94s sys:41.41s real:1860.07s (faults io:555
> non-io:4
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 10:30:52PM +0200, Marcin Król wrote:
> > The old amd64 builder is not running. Builder account on previous
> > machine is empty. At least I was told so. We have third amd64 builder? :)
>
> I'll answer myself. Yes, we may have third builder. The very old one in
> old jajcus
This happened to me twice today:
Installing set #9
Processing dependencies...
db4.6-4.6.18-1.i686 obsoleted by db4.6-4.6.19-1.i686
There are 1 package to install, 1 to remove:
I db4.6-4.6.19-1.i686
R db4.6-4.6.18-1.i686
Need to get 417.5KB of archives (417.5KB to download).
A
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 04:50:11PM +0200, Wojciech Błaszkowski wrote:
>
> additional info about what a patch85 does.
applied, thanks.
--
http://www.mysza.eu.org/ | Everybody needs someone sure, someone true,
PLD Linux developer| Everybody needs some solid rock, I know I do.
___
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 05:14:26PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> however i use code from WORKING branch.
And which do we prefer - HEAD or WORKING? Sources from which branch are
used with Ac/Th builders?
--
http://www.mysza.eu.org/ | Everybody needs someone sure, someone true,
PLD Linux devel
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 04:29:26PM +0200, Pawel Golaszewski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It seems that /usr/lib/rpm/check-files is confused when in spec is used
> "%exclude". Files excluded aren't shown as unpackaged.
Should they? I allways thought of unpackaged files as of those which you
may have misse
Hi,
Our CVS suddenly stopped working yesterday. When I used 'xm cons' to get
a console I saw the following:
tty1 ep09-cvs login: Unable to handle kernel paging request at 880013318604
RIP:
{gr_lookup_task_ip_table+60}
PGD 81e067 PUD 81f067 PMD 8b9067 PTE 0
Oops: [1] SMP
CPU 0
Modules l
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 03:11:06PM +0200, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
> I made two patches (attached) to address the second problem:
> 1. geninitrd-rootdev.patch
> 2. geninitrd-lvm_initramfs.patch
I've applied those patches on trunk.
--
http://www.mysza.eu.org/ | Everybody needs someone sure, someo
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 03:11:06PM +0200, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
> 2. the initrd (initramfs in fact) was unable to mount my root device,
>which was an LVM volume.
>
> I made two patches (attached) to address the second problem:
>
> 1. geninitrd-rootdev.patch
>
> 2. geninitrd-lvm_initramfs.pa
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 02:21:07PM +0200, megabajt wrote:
> Author: megabajt Date: Wed Apr 18 12:21:07 2007 GMT
> Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD
> Log message:
> - new
>
> Files affected:
> SPECS:
>xfce4-dict.plugin.spec (NONE -> 1.1) (NEW)
ehrm
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 01:13:07PM +0100, Olivier Thauvin wrote:
> I am pleased to announce I just setup a new PLD mirror in France:
>
> The mirror is located in Europe, France, Paris (48,8°N, 2,33°E).
great to hear that!
> Please let me know if have somethings special to do or if I have to use
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 11:03:23PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> there's OOo 2.1.0-0.m6 in ac-i586, ac-i686 ready trees
>
> happy testing!
Kudos!
Thanks.
--
http://www.mysza.eu.org/ | Everybody needs someone sure, someone true,
PLD Linux developer| Everybody needs some solid rock, I kn
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 08:22:06PM +0100, Michal Chruszcz wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Today has begun the new edition of Google Summer of Code. From now on
> projects may supply applications to Google until March 12. Full
> timeline is here:
> http://code.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=6032
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 03:42:39PM +0100, arekm wrote:
> Author: arekmDate: Fri Feb 9 14:42:39 2007 GMT
> Module: SPECS Tag: LINUX_2_6_20
> Log message:
> - move /lib/modules/*/build symlink to proper package
I've been also thinking about this
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 02:18:28AM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On Thursday 08 February 2007, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> > mono 1.2.3 seems to build on all Ac archs (well, still waiting for
> > amd64), including alpha and sparc (bootstrap needed on these two - just
> > done test builds can be installed
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 07:54:58PM +0100, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
> Czy ktos zapisany na pld-users-* moglby to tam poslac?
> Could someone subscribed to pld-users-* send it there?
forwarded.
--
http://www.mysza.eu.org/ | Everybody needs someone sure, someone true,
PLD Linux developer| Ever
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 12:28:01AM +0100, Marcin Król wrote:
> > so the question is, can we achieve the same (have geninitrd working in
> > Ac) and having the same source for both Ac and Th?
>
> I wrote it already on devel-pl and users-pl, but well, I'll write it
> here too. Maybe it will give peo
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 10:46:32PM +0100, adamg wrote:
> Author: adamgDate: Wed Jan 31 21:46:32 2007 GMT
> Module: SPECS Tag: AC-branch
> Log message:
> - seems like there is no switch_root in AC's busybox, use chroot instead
> - release 2
so th
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 07:35:03PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> looks like it keeps sending the same diff for any page edit
>
> please somebody fix it.
>
> it's a shame if our internal resources don't work properly.
I am no moinmoin guru, can't do much about it. I asked people on
pld-users-pl a
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 09:05:53PM +0100, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> > I am not sure about that one. Somebody suggested removing libnscd from
> > builders before building samba, but that's more like a workaround than a
> > real fix.
>
> And it would be probably wrong (disabling nscd support in libsmbcl
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 02:54:22AM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On Sunday 24 December 2006 02:52, Adam Gołębiowski wrote:
> > What is the solution? Rebuild libnscd, then rebuild samba, then rebuild
> > the rest?
> any luck resolving it?
I am not sure about that one. Somebody
On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 02:50:33PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Th production builders are currently on-hold due to missing th-i486 machine
> (we lost it unfortunately). Only test builds are allowed at this moment.
>
> We are looking for a new machine for th-i486 builder p
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 11:40:48PM +0100, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 11:12:45PM +0100, Marcin Król wrote:
> > > It helped. Thanks. Just STBRed.
> >
> > Blah. amd64 failed :( Any ideas for this one?
> >
> > http://buildlogs.pld-linux.org/index.php?dist=ac&arch=amd64&ok=0&id=034b
On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 09:04:02PM +0100, Łukasz Jernaś wrote:
> Dnia środa, 20 grudnia 2006 01:22, Cezary Krzyzanowski napisał:
> > Dnia 19-12-2006, wto o godzinie 23:24 +0100, Łukasz Jernaś napisał(a):
> > > root=0303 (tried /dev/hda3 also) I'll check the rest tomorrow, I can
> > > barely see the
On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 05:32:07PM +, PLD ac-sparc builder wrote:
> kdebase.spec (AC-branch): FAILED
>
> --- kdebase.spec:AC-branch:
> Build-Time: user:14294.63s sys:1364.57s real:17130.44s (faults io:1179
> non-io:83908943)
> + cp
> /tmp/B.01ed92/kdebase-3.5.5-root-builder/usr/share/apps/kd
On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 07:36:22PM +, PLD ac-amd64 builder wrote:
> wdm.spec (AC-branch): FAILED
>
> --- wdm.spec:AC-branch:
> Build-Time: user:13.30s sys:2.76s real:22.30s (faults io:0 non-io:758058)
>
> Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.89732
> (...)
This build is undeterminis
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 06:45:34PM +0100, adamg wrote:
> Author: adamgDate: Fri Dec 22 17:45:34 2006 GMT
> Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD
> Log message:
> - new
>
> Files affected:
> SPECS:
>slim.spec (1.11 -> 1.12) (NEW)
I noticed that afte
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 11:05:57AM +0100, Michał Łukaszek wrote:
> STBR to AC-ready please:
>
> error: libpq.so.4 is required by pure-ftpd-1.0.21-1
sent (release 2)
> error: libpq.so.4 is required by tpop3d-1.5.3-28
sent (release 29)
> error: libpq.so.4 is required by exim-4.63-3
release 3 wa
$ poldek -s . -V
Loading [pndir]/home/services/ftp/pld/dists/2.0/PLD/[...]/packages.ndir.gz...
Przeczytano 13503 pakiety
Verifying dependencies...
błąd: amarok-1.4.3-1: req libmtp.so.3 not found
błąd: dotnet-gecko-sharp-0.6-5: req mozilla-embedded not found
błąd: blam-1.6.1-1: req mozilla not found
php4.spec:AC-branch
php4-eaccelerator.spec:AC-branch
php.spec:AC-branch
php-eaccelerator.spec:AC-branch
thanks.
--
http://www.mysza.eu.org/ | Everybody needs someone sure, someone true,
PLD Linux developer| Everybody needs some solid rock, I know I do.
___
On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 10:18:09PM +0200, Adam Gołębiowski wrote:
> php4.spec:AC-branch
> libtiff.spec:AC-branch
php4-eaccelerator.spec:AC-branch(needs rebuilt)
x11vnc.spec:AC-branch (CVE-2006-2450)
vim.spec:AC-branch (bugfixes)
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 01:40:19PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 August 2006 09:57, zawadaa wrote:
> > Author: zawadaa Date: Tue Aug 8 06:57:49 2006 GMT
> > Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD
> > Log message:
> > - Source0 is back
>
> http://th
On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 10:18:09PM +0200, Adam Gołębiowski wrote:
> php4.spec:AC-branch
> libtiff.spec:AC-branch
>
> both contain security fixes.
thanks ankry.
two more specs:
php4-eaccelerator.spec:AC-branch
x11vnc.spec:AC-branch
first one needs to be rebuilt becase of php4
php4.spec:AC-branch
libtiff.spec:AC-branch
both contain security fixes.
thanks
--
http://www.mysza.eu.org/ | Everybody needs someone sure, someone true,
PLD Linux developer| Everybody needs some solid rock, I know I do.
___
pld-devel-en mailin
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 08:36:01PM +0200, Paweł Gołaszewski wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, adamg wrote:
> > Author: adamgDate: Fri Jul 14 21:56:08 2006 GMT
> > Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD
> > Log message:
> > - /etc/ftpd should be owned
> [...]
> >
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 01:02:48PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On Monday 10 July 2006 17:28, Adam Gołębiowski wrote:
> > one can find rpms for ac-i686 (together with pndir-style indices) for
> > OpenOffice.org 2.0.3 which was released few days ago.
>
> i noticed this alread
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 10:07:02PM +0200, wolf wrote:
> Author: wolf Date: Wed Jul 12 20:07:02 2006 GMT
> Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD
> Log message:
> - 1.1.16.1
> - changes in dependency generators cause some problems with mscorlib, so let's
> pro
Hi folks,
On:
http://mamut.pld-linux.org/~adamg/openoffice.org/
one can find rpms for ac-i686 (together with pndir-style indices) for
OpenOffice.org 2.0.3 which was released few days ago.
Previous builds, if anyone needs them, are available too:
http://mamut.pld-linux.org/~adam
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 03:14:31PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> 1. Which php-pear-PEAR is usable for HEAD php - AC-branch only?
seems so, I didn't track glen's recent changes in
[EMAIL PROTECTED], don't know what the problem is.
> 2. post script sometimes outputs bogus optional packages, e.g.:
>
/dev/nvram is 600,root,root now. In order to use kmilo's thinkpad
plugin, this has to be at least readable by user (at least read-only is
sufficient for volume controls and 'access ibm' button).
Anyone objects on changing it to 664,root,root? Or maybe it would be
better to 660,root,$group, but wh
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 02:52:44PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> ooo 2 to ac?
>
> are there any problems with that?
> amd64 can be forgotten, as ooo1 doesn't have it either.
ppc/sparc build is not verified (anyone cares about these?)
And I'd wait for OOo 2.0.3, which is scheduled to be released
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 10:29:57PM +0200, Fryderyk Dziarmagowski wrote:
> > Google doesn't say much about this. Any clues?
>
> enabled composite extension ?
yep. thanks for the hint.
--
http://www.mysza.eu.org/ | Everybody needs someone sure, someone true,
PLD Linux developer| Everybod
Few days ago I noticed some of applications I use became unstable or even
unusable:
- qiv:
Gdk-ERROR **: BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes)
serial 114 error_code 8 request_code 2 minor_code 0
- seamonkey (with mplayerplug-in, macromedia-flash, java and djvulibre
plugins):
The program 'G
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 01:08:28PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> Which isn't available for x86_64 too, so it doesn't matter.
blah, I was sure we had OOo 1.x for amd64. Sorry.
--
http://www.mysza.eu.org/ | Everybody needs someone sure, someone true,
PLD Linux developer| Everybody needs som
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 12:51:23PM +0200, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
> > On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 06:03:32PM +0200, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
> > > http://hedera.linuxnews.pl/_news/2006/05/16/_long/3852.html
> > > http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/webmink?entry=jdk_on_gnu_linux_something
> >
> > Great.
> >
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 06:03:32PM +0200, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
> http://hedera.linuxnews.pl/_news/2006/05/16/_long/3852.html
> http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/webmink?entry=jdk_on_gnu_linux_something
Great.
Maybe we could rebuild openoffice 1.x with java support, prepare
eclipse and push those
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 10:47:07PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> i made patch to truncate changelog at build time [1].
> the question is how many entries to limit the truncation, and should the
> truncation setting be different for Ac and Th?
I guess 15-20 entries should be sufficient for both
cp SPECS/php-gtk.spec,v SPECS/php-gtk2.spec,v
Thanks.
--
.. :: Przeznacz 1% swojego podatku dochodowego: :: ..
.. :: http://www.pomocdladominiki.com.pl/ -- możesz pomóc :: ..
| Everybody needs someone sure, someone true,
PLD Linux developer | Every
error: abiword-2.4.2-1: req libwv-1.0.so.3 not found
error: bigsister-1.02-3: req perl(BS_win32) not found
error: bigsister-oracle-1.02-3: req perl-DBD-Oracle not found
error: kdevelop-i18n-3.5.2-1: req kdevelop = 7:3.3.1 version mismatch
error: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: req kernel24-up = 2.4.32-4 version
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 02:23:21AM +0100, Tomasz Pala wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 19:03:00 +0100, Adam Gołębiowski wrote:
>
> > > that was stupid, java was downloaded to distfiles and now anyone can
> > > download it from there, it's illegal
> > >
>
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 07:00:32PM +0100, Przemek Iskra wrote:
> that was stupid, java was downloaded to distfiles and now anyone can
> download it from there, it's illegal
>
> so fix it quickly and beg someone(TM) to delete it form distfiles
I've just dropped it from distfiles.
--
.. :: ht
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 06:17:10PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> Probably at the end of month I'll start tagging AC-release so there is still
> a
> few days for fixes.
What's the current status of AC release plan? Is there anything more
that needs to be done ?
--
.. :: http://www.p
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 03:03:28PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> On Sunday 22 January 2006 14:55, Adam Gołębiowski wrote:
>
> > I've received a few positive responses about 1.5-0.2. I've bumped relase
> > to 1, would be great if you could send to ready.
>
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 10:14:34PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> On Thursday 19 January 2006 19:18, Adam Gołębiowski wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 06:17:10PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> > > Probably at the end of month I'll start tagging AC-release so
1 - 100 of 158 matches
Mail list logo
