Re: [Th] SMP for all!

OK! 2.6.20 is coming, maybe it will be good idea to make it first SMP by default kernel, which doesn't have smp suffix and obsoletes smp kernel? We can leave with_up option which will generate kernel-up and if everything goes well we can easily remove it. Regards Artur ___

Re: [Th] SMP for all!

Paweł Sikora wrote: > ./cdrom/Kconfig-tristate "Matsushita/Panasonic/Creative, > Longshine, TEAC CDROM support" > ./cdrom/Kconfig-tristate "Philips/LMS CM206 CDROM support" > ./cdrom/Kconfig-config CDU31A > ./cdrom/Kconfig-tristate "Sony CDU31A/CDU33A CDROM support" Looks

Re: [Th] SMP for all!

Artur Flinta wrote: > Marcin Król wrote: >> Unfortunately one of them was PIII capable. I think its mainboard/bios >> fault. > > Did You try upgrading BIOS or trying to trace problem? > What HW is this? An what about trying

Re: [Th] SMP for all!

Marcin Król wrote: > Unfortunately one of them was PIII capable. I think its mainboard/bios > fault. Did You try upgrading BIOS or trying to trace problem? What HW is this? Artur ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://list

[Th] SMP for all!

Hi! I have idea to provide in Th only SMP kernels. Pro: - simplify kernel build process - simplify building kernel dependent packages (drivers, VMware, VirtualBox, etc.) - unified kernel for support - full speed on most modern hardware (there is no possibility to install by mistake UP kernel o

Re: SPECS: horde-webmail.spec (NEW) - new; needs lots of work

Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > well. i think the spec should be just: > R: horde-imp, horde-ingo, horde-kronolith, horde-turba, horde-nag, horde-mnemo OK, thx :) Artur ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mai

Re: SPECS: horde-webmail.spec (NEW) - new; needs lots of work

glen wrote: > Author: glen Date: Tue Nov 7 11:13:16 2006 GMT > Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD > Log message: > - new; needs lots of work [EMAIL PROTECTED] SPECS]$ ./builder horde-webmail.spec # $Revision: 1.2 $, $Date: 2006/11/14 21:10:39 $ Available

Re: [th] upgrading openssl

Piotr Skwarna wrote: > poldek:/all-avail> upgrade openssl-0.9.8a-2 [...] > any idea ? Nie używaj th-test :) Artur ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

Re: SPECS: vte.spec - broken, rel. down to 0.1

Dnia 04-08-2005, czw o godzinie 11:05 +0200, Paweł Sakowski napisał(a): > One of "previous commiter screwed up the upgrade", "doesn't build", > "this version crashes" in the commit log would have made me happy. But glib was broken, not vte. Artur -- Każdy problem ma swoje rozwiązanie, jeżeli