200\0\1\0\5\0\0\0\0\2ha\4pool\16sks-keyserv"...,
> 65536, 0, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(53),
> sin_addr=inet_addr("8.8.4.4")}, [16]) = 184
> keepassx-2.0.2-2.x86_64
> +++ exited with 0 +++
According to Jeff it's a feature. See his answer:
http://l
On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 12:00:52 +0100 Jakub Bogusz
wrote:
> Is $GIT_DIR exported intentionally when executing %prep, %build,
> %install?
It is set up and used internally by builder.sh script. But in December
glen introduced fix that cleans GIT_* variables just before
calling $RPMBUILD. Which revisio
On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 15:58:23 +0100
Jacek Konieczny wrote:
> On 2015-12-31 15:32, Kacper Kornet wrote:
> > On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 12:46:58 +0100
> > Jacek Konieczny wrote:
>
> >> python3-setuptools. I would fix it immediately by our GIT server
> >>
On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 12:46:58 +0100
Jacek Konieczny wrote:
>
> > python3-pygments-2.0.2-5.noarch: required "python3-setuptools" is
> > provided by the following packages:
> > a) python3-distribute-0.7.3-3.noarch
> > b) python3-setuptools-18.6.1-3.noarch
>
> This is an error. python3-distribute
On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 12:46:00PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On 04.06.2015 12:19, Kacper Kornet wrote:
> >And the original slow command was:
> >rpm -qp --nodigest --nosignature --qf %{R}
> >google-chrome-stable-43.0.2357.81-1.x86_64.rpm
> >called during buildin
On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 11:51:57AM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On 04.06.2015 00:07, Kacper Kornet wrote:
> >On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 10:33:24PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> >>On 03.06.2015 20:02, Kacper Kornet wrote:
> >>>What should we do about %{_hkp_keyserver}
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 10:33:24PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On 03.06.2015 20:02, Kacper Kornet wrote:
> >What should we do about %{_hkp_keyserver} in rpm. Right now it is set to
> >hkp://keys.rpm5.org which I think is down currently.
> >1. Set it to %nil
> >2.
What should we do about %{_hkp_keyserver} in rpm. Right now it is set to
hkp://keys.rpm5.org which I think is down currently.
1. Set it to %nil
2. Set it to hkp://pgp.mit.edu (Fedora and OpenSuse use
http://pgp.mit.edu but I'm not sure if our rpm can do it).
--
Kacper
__
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 04:06:23PM +0100, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Dec 2014, Kacper Kornet wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 11:29:05PM +0100, baggins wrote:
> > > commit e8ed3f0e4ba55966f3aa461d8deb6617f32d106e
> > > Author: Jan Rękorajski
> > > Da
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 12:15:09PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On 17.12.2014 10:07, Kacper Kornet wrote:
> >> - behave as proper sh when invoked as /bin/sh, wothout fancy,
> >> incompatible hacks
> >> - rel 2
> >This change breaks our rc-scripts:
&
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 11:29:05PM +0100, baggins wrote:
> commit e8ed3f0e4ba55966f3aa461d8deb6617f32d106e
> Author: Jan Rękorajski
> Date: Tue Dec 16 23:30:41 2014 +0100
> - behave as proper sh when invoked as /bin/sh, wothout fancy,
> incompatible hacks
> - rel 2
This change breaks
In all crons with packages on ftp (cronie, fcron, hc-cron) the directory
/etc/cron.d belongs to group crond and has mode 750.
However the directory is also provided by package filesystem, and there
it belongs to group root and has mode 755.
So there are two solutions:
1) Change gid and mode for
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 06:22:54PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 05:59:44PM +0200, draenog wrote:
> > +--- lib/rpmfc.c.orig 2014-10-07 15:53:03.185631053 +0100
> > lib/rpmfc.c2014-10-07 16:02:32.487591097 +0100
> > +@@ -593,7 +593,7 @@
> > +
> > + { "Desktop
Would someone protest if the patch during rpm buld run with "--fuzz 0"
and without "-s" option?
The current setting means that currently patch with --fuzz 2 and there
is no information about fuzzes and offsets in build logs.
--
Kacper
___
pld-deve
Three unintentional commits has been removed from master in packages/dracut. So
if
your master contains any of
d8f52b27f0fd6a7f54bec4b16a07535296f95fc9
a719eeb6fc868046af63ad199b918499c9220b1b
8343b8012bcd48d216804d90fcdf181663671ad9
please be careful with git pull and push.
--
Kacper
_
The master branch in php package has been reset to point to the PHP_5_5.
The old master is now called PHP_5_3. Therefore please be careful with
the pulls in this packages. Probably the best idead is to perform
git-fetch and then reset your master branch by git-reset to
origin/master.
--
Kacper
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 11:07:22AM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> http://docs.php.net/manual/en/migration56.new-features.php
> how you see php future in pld-th?
> i see now that we should merge 5.5 -> php, 5.3 -> php53, so we would
> have php52, php53, php (5.2, 5.3, 5.5) versions
> and when 5.6 i
On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 09:38:33PM +0200, glen wrote:
> commit 7ad420b548cd9104438d74b97aaea673c03a37a8
> Author: Elan Ruusamäe
> Date: Sun Apr 6 22:38:02 2014 +0300
> drop now unccessary coreutils,diffutils,findutils requires
Coreutils is still required. For example git-pull uses printf a
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 06:50:09PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
> On Friday 28 of March 2014, Kacper Kornet wrote:
> > In PLD kernels there are both ide and ata drivers for the same controllers,
> > for example ata_piix and piix. Dependant on which one is loaded first
&g
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 09:22:41PM +0100, Marcin Krol wrote:
> >I think the second option is the simplest one, so I would like to
> >implement it in PLD, unless someone has preference.
> Personally I'm using dracut with host-only option enabled. It uses
> system wide module blacklist and includes
In PLD kernels there are both ide and ata drivers for the same controllers,
for example ata_piix and piix. Dependant on which one is loaded first
the disks are visible as /dev/sd* or /dev/hd*.
The kernel help says "Users of ATA hardware are encouraged to migrate to
the newer ATA subsystem ("Seri
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 11:08:49PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> posting here, as maybe someday somebody wants to fix this.
> seems start_udev trigger is invoked when *udev* package is removed,
> and that call seems even to succeed!
> # rpm -q dev udev
> dev-3.4-10.x86_64
> udev-208-11.x86_64
An
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 09:04:08PM +0100, Witold Filipczyk wrote:
> W dniu 22.03.2014 o 20:47 Kacper Kornet pisze:
> >On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 09:35:42AM +0100, witekfl wrote:
> >>commit 8cd07b070798719c37aeece598a1ee99c0674596
> >>Author: Witold Filipczyk
> >
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 09:35:42AM +0100, witekfl wrote:
> commit 8cd07b070798719c37aeece598a1ee99c0674596
> Author: Witold Filipczyk
> Date: Sat Feb 15 09:33:06 2014 +0100
> - BR: libsemanage-devel libsemanage-static
> - added at-char-completion.patch
> - rel 6
Where does BR: llib
Short version: I would like to remove form poldek --noorder option passed to
rpm
by poldek during package removal.
Long version:
Currently the order of packages during removal by poldek is broken in Th. For
example:
$ rpm -q --qf '[%{REQUIRENAME} %{REQUIREFLAGS:deptype}\n]' test-sub
/bin/sh pr
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 03:21:28PM +0100, Marcin Krol wrote:
> >wget -nv --no-check-certificate --user-agent=PLD/distfiles -O
> >./tmp/338293ab-1349-44bb-9002-ba0ccb8c0c3e/c5f88765e74945f7fa18c3a3141f5334/bios.bin-1.7.4.gz
> > http://code.coreboot.org/p/seabios/downloads/get/bios.bin-1.7.4.gz:
> >
It has been suggested that repositories for rc-scripts and geninitrd
should be migrated from subversion to git. So far I have setup two
read only repositories:
git://git.pld-linux.org/readonly/geninitrd.git
git://git.pld-linux.org/readonly/rc-scripts.git
1) So is there anyone who whas objections
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 04:31:25PM +0200, kiesiu wrote:
> commit 5a16848fdde49d61bc913455b6509f22e5bd8252
> Author: Łukasz Kieś
> Date: Thu Oct 24 16:29:14 2013 +0200
> - updated to 2.1.4
> - updated BRs
> - patches 3 and 4 are applied upstream
> gtkpod.spec | 15 ++-
>
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 11:56:37PM +0200, Kacper Kornet wrote:
> commit 289a902d894a2dc8d78d5e4a762568132f3c8108
> Author: Kacper Kornet
> Date: Mon Oct 14 22:52:22 2013 +0100
> don't pass and accept GIT_ variables
> Passing GIT_* variables can break some p
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 01:34:37PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
>
> a. why is check relying on order of things in deps
> b. why would rpm have the order randomized now, i.e over all these
> years the a) has "just worked"
>
>
> Original Message
> Subject: Noarch error: perl-M
There is now a cgit instance installed and configured on
http://git.pld-linux.org/. So if for some reason you don't like the
gitweb engine you can check the alternative at:
http://git.pld-linux.org/cgi-bin/cgit.cgi
--
Kacper
___
pld-devel-en mailin
It looks like dhcpcd-6.0.2-1 from th-main has a problem with sending the
correct hostname to the server. It is fixed in dhcpcd-6.0.5-1 from th-test.
--
Kacper
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/ma
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 12:43:18PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On 04.06.2013 18:29, qboosh wrote:
> >commit d5dab9b29e05a829d0773920d97e7a2897e1d587
> >Author: Jakub Bogusz
> >Date: Tue Jun 4 17:17:32 2013 +0200
> > Back to libjpeg 8d in this spec
> > This reverts commit 57a92107f9272
I have just encountered an rpm behaviour which is counter intuitive for
me. Let's say that I have a package with one directory and a file in it:
$ rpm -ql test-pkg
/tmp/dir
/tmp/dir/a
Then I remove the dir directory and in its place I create a symbolic
link to another directory:
$ mkdir /tmp/di
There is a new way to send requests to Th builders. Every developer can
send a test build with command:
ssh g...@git.pld-linux.org stbr
Developers who have such priviliges can also send ready builds (the ones
which go to Th-test):
ssh g...@git.pld-linux.org stbr -r
More options (most fo
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 04:08:56PM +0100, Kacper Kornet wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 03:55:35PM +0100, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 03:40:43PM +0100, Kacper Kornet wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 12:06:12AM +0100, glen wro
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 03:55:35PM +0100, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 03:40:43PM +0100, Kacper Kornet wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 12:06:12AM +0100, glen wrote:
> > > commit b012dc654b555d36b557416b2d78f3a98e5c22b9
> > > Author: Elan Ruusamäe
&g
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 12:06:12AM +0100, glen wrote:
> commit b012dc654b555d36b557416b2d78f3a98e5c22b9
> Author: Elan Ruusamäe
> Date: Tue Mar 5 01:05:40 2013 +0200
> validate that man links point to something resolveable
> for now, links to "outside" current package are not allowed
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 04:15:04PM +0200, Kacper Kornet wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 03:49:51PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> > Is there a way to just copy a repo (without setting the old one r/o)?
> It can be done by creating a new repository and pushing to it. The only
> thi
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 02:35:09AM +0100, Daniel Dawid Majewski al. LordBlick
wrote:
> @@ -105,9 +107,6 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
> %dir %{_datadir}/mixxx/translations
> %{_datadir}/mixxx/skins/cross.*
> %doc %{_datadir}/mixxx/skins/*.xsl
> -# This is the default skin
> -%{_datadir}/mixxx/skins
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 03:15:27PM +0100, Kacper Kornet wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 02:31:10PM +0100, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> > When creating new repo:
> > $ slug.py init postgresql-module-pldebugger
> > Enter passphrase for key '/home/comp/.ssh/id_rsa':
> >
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 02:31:10PM +0100, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> When creating new repo:
> $ slug.py init postgresql-module-pldebugger
> Enter passphrase for key '/home/comp/.ssh/id_rsa':
> Initialized empty Git repository in
> /cvs/root/gitolite/repositories/packages/postgresql-module-pldebugger.g
* lang=en
There is a new version of git-core-slug on ftp. The new feature is a new
pull subcommand:
slug.py pull
It is a faster equivalent of running git pull --rebase for all packages
matching pattern. It can be even more speed up by adding option --noall.
Then the rebase will be attempted
Description to vim-rt says:
This package contains macros, documentation, syntax configuration and
manual pages for Vim. If you want to take advantage of Vim more
powerful features, you should install this package.
But I've been just surprised that it is actually required by vim? Does
someone kn
The following packages have been created but nothing has ever been
pushed to them:
drush.git
gstreamer1.git
keepassx.git
perl-Net-UPnP.git
perl-RT-Extension-JSGantt.git
Unless someone protests they will be removed.
--
Kacper
___
pld-devel-en mailing
After upgrade to git-core-1.8.0 git push can start to complain with
message about unset push.default value. My suggestion is to set
push.default to "simple":
git config --global push.default simple
It can prevent from pushing some unwanted branches.
---
Git w wersji 1.8.0 może zacząć
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:21:03AM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On 09/10/12 04:52, Kacper Kornet wrote:
> >In my opinion a better idea is to keep in a package a script that
> >generates the compressed patch,pushes it to dropin and updates
> ># Patch-md5:
> go on with this
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 05:59:42PM +0200, Paweł Sikora wrote:
> On Friday 05 of October 2012 16:05:16 Kacper Kornet wrote:
> > Recently one email to pld-cvs was blocked due to large size of generated
> > diff. The "offending" file was gcc-branch.diff from crossmin
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 03:49:51PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 05:46:52PM +0200, Kacper Kornet wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 05:10:32PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> > > On 10.09.2012 20:45, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> > > >On Sat, Sep 08, 2
0525.patch
--
Kacper Kornet
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 05:10:32PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On 10.09.2012 20:45, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> >On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 10:08:36PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> >>>What is the procedure to rename already existing (also on ftp) package
> >>>after moving to git?
> >>>cvs2git howto says "
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 05:47:29PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 02:46:00PM +0200, draenog wrote:
> > commit 6de214b3617a11527162fa443ecca342f52cb035
> > Author: Kacper Kornet
> > Date: Thu Aug 16 14:44:01 2012 +0200
> > updated to 2.8.9
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 06:33:30AM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> I think it would nice to have some httpd rewrite rules to easily access
> individual package files from git master (at least .spec), like it was
> possible with CVS (SPECS/PACKAGE.spec or packages/PACKAGE/PACKAGE.spec).
> Now one has t
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 06:37:23PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On 17.08.2012 18:20, Kacper Kornet wrote:
> >>> glen@carme-pld packages/php $ LC_ALL=en_US.utf8 rpm -qp
> >>> /home/users/glen/rpm/SRPMS/php54-5.4.5-0.15.src.rpm --changelog
> >>> |head
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 05:50:00PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> comments on this?
> if no comments, i'll merge it to master
I would say that 7 minutes between sending this email and doing merge is
a little too small amount of time left for comments.
> extra bonus part from this, the %changelog
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 04:55:09AM +0200, Kacper Kornet wrote:
> For some time source builders will be down for small fixes.
> They should be back in less then 0.5 h.
And they are back.
--
Kacper
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lis
For some time source builders will be down for small fixes.
They should be back in less then 0.5 h.
--
Kacper
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 02:03:24PM +0300, Caleb Maclennan wrote:
> Is there any place where the entire PLD git repository can be cloned
> as single repository?
Not right now.
> I realize this would be a read-only thing, but
> the multiple repository layout is problematic for some things such as
>
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 02:42:23PM +0200, g...@camk.edu.pl wrote:
> I was asked to move rpm-macro.sh together with its history from
> rpm-build-macros to rpm-build-tools. But first I prefer to ask if
> there are any objections to it.
I'm sorry for this email. It was written by me not glen. Glen is
I was asked to move rpm-macro.sh together with its history from
rpm-build-macros to rpm-build-tools. But first I prefer to ask if
there are any objections to it.
--
Kacper
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 07:29:50PM +0100, Artur Wroblewski wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Lord Blick wrote:
> > In reply on message at 30.07.2012 20:02, from Artur Wroblewski:
> >> Hi,
> >> How to remove repository?
> > http://www.pld-linux.org/dokuwiki/cvs2git
> > http://www.pld-lin
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 07:02:43PM +0100, Artur Wroblewski wrote:
> How to remove repository?
Write to gitadmin or to the list.
> BTW. The HOWTO claims that ~/rpm/packages/builder
> shall be used to build a package, but this one tries to fetch
> spec files from CVS actually.
Are you sure your ~/
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 03:22:16PM +0200, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
> Hi,
> What is the current procedure for renaming packages in git?
> Both cases: when the package already has some auto/ tags and when it
> does not.
Every developer can do:
ssh g...@git.pld-linux.org move oldname newname
Afterw
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 03:17:57PM +0200, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:56:33PM +0200, Kacper Kornet wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:40:51PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> > > there's still no place for template-specs in git
> > > pls
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:40:51PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> there's still no place for template-specs in git
> pls import it to git, or whatever is their place, so changes to git
> based vcs to them can be committed
I've just put them to projects/template-specs.git.
--
Kacper
___
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 01:54:40AM +0300, Michael Shigorin wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 12:02:58AM +0200, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
> > But that would be not 'totally unordered'.
> > GIT history is just not linear
> It's the different history: take %changelog as NEWS
> and commit messages as CHAN
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 03:47:41PM -0400, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
> On Jul 16, 2012, at 3:43 PM, Kacper Kornet wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 06:38:10PM +0200, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 03:16:02PM -0400, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
> >>&g
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 06:38:10PM +0200, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 03:16:02PM -0400, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
> > On Jul 12, 2012, at 2:26 PM, Kacper Kornet wrote:
> > >> That can be because 'git rev-list', used to generate the changelog,
>
There is a read-only repository with snapshot of specs on master
branches in all packages: git://git.pld-linux.org/SPECS
It is updated every 5 minutes.
--
Kacper Kornet
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld
ckage build failed. (no more info)
> I have examined the generated changelog in the temporary spec file and indeed:
> > %changelog
> > * Wed Jul 11 2012 Kacper Kornet c9933bf
> > Add help message explaining how to push branch for the first time
> > [...]
> > * Wed Jul 1
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 05:34:59PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On 11.07.2012 17:26, Kacper Kornet wrote:
> >>> In src builders I prefer to keep it in clone of git repo. This way if I
> >>> want to make a final check if the new changes don't break anything I
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 04:21:46PM +0200, Kacper Kornet wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 05:08:40PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> > On 11.07.2012 16:03, Kacper Kornet wrote:
> > >A small doubt about it. Package rpm-build-tools is cloned to
> > >chroots used by builders
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 05:08:40PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On 11.07.2012 16:03, Kacper Kornet wrote:
> >A small doubt about it. Package rpm-build-tools is cloned to
> >chroots used by builders. Are all this tools really needed there?
> in src-builders probably (two setups
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 03:09:26PM +0200, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 03:03:44PM +0200, Kacper Kornet wrote:
> > A small doubt about it. Package rpm-build-tools is cloned to chroots
> > used by builders. Are all this tools really needed there?
> If they d
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 04:17:27PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On 09.07.2012 15:40, Kacper Kornet wrote:
> >>> those (except pldnotify.awk and pearize.sh) are daily tools used to
> >>> manage pld packages developing
> >>> do they all fit to rpm-buil
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 06:31:22PM +0200, Marcin Krol wrote:
> >When we were using CVS it was possible to resend tagged package to builders
> >using package:auto-th-... syntax.
> >Something changed or some builder functions were not updated for
> >auto/th/ prefix?
> Following change is needed to
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 08:16:59PM +0200, Kacper Kornet wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 07:54:11PM +0200, Marcin Krol wrote:
> > >What do you mean by shouldn't fell. Script builder will fail if you run
> > >like: builder -bs -Tp auto/th/ -tt .
> > >and t
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 07:54:11PM +0200, Marcin Krol wrote:
> >What do you mean by shouldn't fell. Script builder will fail if you run
> >like: builder -bs -Tp auto/th/ -tt .
> >and the auto tag generated from required revision already exist. It was
> >the case in CVS, it is the case in git.
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 07:59:30PM +0200, Marcin Krol wrote:
> >Better, but still not the same as previously.
> Thats make-request.sh thing and has nothing to do with change we are
> talking about right now (added -cf to builder script call to allow
> ready builds with auto tags to succeed).
I'm
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 07:25:45PM +0200, Marcin Krol wrote:
> >I have the same fix, but I have not pushed it as I am not 100%
> >happy with it. It changes the send request send with "path/spec:tag"
> Can you explain? I pretty you mean something different than what I'm
> thinking about.
My assump
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 07:19:39PM +0200, Marcin Krol wrote:
> >Hawk has given the solution to the problem. But my question is the
> >purpose of resending the build from the same tag? I'm assume that it
> >would a test build, as the ready one would fail due to preexisting tag.
> No. Ready build wi
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 06:31:22PM +0200, Marcin Krol wrote:
> >When we were using CVS it was possible to resend tagged package to builders
> >using package:auto-th-... syntax.
> >Something changed or some builder functions were not updated for
> >auto/th/ prefix?
> Following change is needed to
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 06:17:53PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 03:20:52PM +, PLD th-src builder wrote:
> > sblim-cmpi-base.spec (auto/th/sblim-cmpi-base-1.6.1-1): FAILED
> > --- sblim-cmpi-base.spec:auto/th/sblim-cmpi-base-1.6.1-1:
> > Build-Time: user:2.17s sys:0.89s
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 05:06:57PM +0300, Caleb Maclennan wrote:
> 2012/7/10 Mariusz Mazur :
> > Or one can alias the 'git' command to a simple script that checks for
> > .git/config, check if remote origin is git.pld-linux.org and if so, uses a
> > different user.email.
> > Hm, I could use that.
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 04:04:01PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 03:40:58PM +0200, Kacper Kornet wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 04:26:00PM +0300, Caleb Maclennan wrote:
> > > 2) Is there a way to set git's user.email config variable without
> &g
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 04:26:00PM +0300, Caleb Maclennan wrote:
> 2) Is there a way to set git's user.email config variable without
> doing it globally? I use git for other things where my pld nick is not
> my email. However with each package being a separate repository,
> setting it in the reposi
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 08:48:58AM +0200, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:14:05AM +0100, Artur Wroblewski wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
> > > Having the project in github may give us a lot of publicity. And github
> > > gives great tools for
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 07:05:40PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 05:55:35PM +0200, Kacper Kornet wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 05:39:33PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> > > Is there any way to change mistaken changelog entry after push?
> > If
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 07:08:02PM +0200, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 07:00:17PM +0200, Kacper Kornet wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 07:01:12PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 05:21:02PM +0200, qboosh wrote:
> > > > T
pld-devel-pl
Cc:
Bcc:
Subject: Git HOWTO: change branch name
Reply-To:
A remark which just came to my mind.
If for any reason you decide to change the name of exported branch, you
should do this in this order:
git branch -m oldname newname
git push origin newname
git push --delete origin oldn
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 10:48:54PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On 07/09/2012 10:26 PM, Lukasz Kies wrote:
> 2. https://github.com/pld-linux/rpm-build-tools is same as
> git.pld/packages/rpm-build-tools due the above
> 3. https://github.com/pld-linux/pld-builder.new - moved to
> git.pld/projects/
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 09:26:19PM +0200, Lukasz Kies wrote:
> 2012/7/9 kiesiu :
> > Author: kiesiu Date: Mon Jul 9 19:18:52 2012 GMT
> > Module: pld-builder.new Tag: HEAD
> > Log message:
> > - change links from cvsweb to gitweb
> > - remove some extra par
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 07:01:12PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 05:21:02PM +0200, qboosh wrote:
> > The branch 'master' was created pointing to:
> > 391e234... - new
> Two remarks:
> 1) In case of new specs their content should be included in mail.
I think it is a safeg
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 05:33:15PM +0200, Lukasz Kies wrote:
> 2012/7/9 Kacper Kornet :
> > On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 04:17:09PM +0200, Kacper Kornet wrote:
> >> Due to git migration, write access to packages in CVS will be disabled in
> >> around 45 minutes.
> > So
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 05:39:33PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> Is there any way to change mistaken changelog entry after push?
If you ask about changelog generated during build process and included
in rpm, then yes. If the commit is annotated with git-notes in name
space refs/notes/commits, then
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 03:21:29PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On 09.07.2012 08:49, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
> >There were some scripts and other files directly under packages/ :
> >adapter
> >adapter.awk
> >bconds.txt
> >builder
> >check-unused-files.py
> >ci
> >civim
> >clean-distfiles.sh
> >comp
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 01:42:31PM +0200, Adam Golebiowski wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 05:09:04AM +0200, Kacper Kornet wrote:
> > * Servers
> > -
> > Anonymous access
> >git://git.pld-linux.org
> > Developers have an rw acces by ssh:
> >
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 08:16:17AM +0200, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Jul 2012, Kacper Kornet wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 04:17:09PM +0200, Kacper Kornet wrote:
> > > Due to git migration, write access to packages in CVS will be disabled in
> > > aro
* Servers
-
Anonymous access
git://git.pld-linux.org
Developers have an rw acces by ssh:
ssh://g...@git.pld-linux.org
Note: Every developer should use the same account: git
* Builder script
Version which can work with git repositories you can find in packet
rpm-
On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 04:17:09PM +0200, Kacper Kornet wrote:
> Due to git migration, write access to packages in CVS will be disabled in
> around 45 minutes.
So the official repositories of PLD packages are now in git:
git://git.pld-linux.org/packages/*
ssh://g...@pld-linux.org/packages/
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
