broader write access to upstream repo?
>
> I have not heard from the author for a long time :(
> Maybe we should fork it and keep it in our git under projects/ ?
>
> Author in CC.
It looks like I can give you write access to the upstream repository
as well, jus
h wayland and xorg, but none of
them works for me :(
I'm afraid we should remove this package from th-test.
--
Marcin Banasiak
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
date.
>
> I don't have a builder yet, planing to reuse i486 one.
> But, there is one big showstopper for x32, that is broken poldek,
Already fixed.
--
Marcin Banasiak
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
2013/2/14 Elan Ruusamäe:
> how gtkspell 3.x should be packaged?
I think that we should upgrade gtkspell.spec to 3.x and create
gtkspell2.spec for 2.x. Sooner or later packages that depend on 2.x
will be ported to the new API and then we can simply remove gtkspell2.
--
Marcin Banas
t looks like missing pkcs11 component in gnome-keyring-daemon.
--
Marcin Banasiak
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
can then get a meaningful
>backtrace from your debugger if you break on the gdk_x_error() function.)
clutter-1.12.2-2 from th-test should help.
--
Marcin Banasiak
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
reported:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=673422
--
Marcin Banasiak
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
(s) found:
icedtea6-jdk-1.8.3-1.i686
java-gcj-compat-devel-1.0.80-8.i686
java-sun-1.6.0.24-1.i686
java5-sun-1.5.0.22-2.i686
To handle this case in spec file you should require jdk, which is
provided by all these packages.
--
Marcin Banasiak
___
pld-devel-e
t; Tag auto-th-cdcat-1_2-1 already exists (spec release: 1.29).
^
You should increase release.
--
Marcin Banasiak
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-li
Please rename Thunar-vfs to thunar-vfs. Thanks.
--
Marcin Banasiak
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Jakub Bogusz wrote:
[...]
> What is this? Why not browser-plugins?
mozilla-firefox has been replaced by iceweasel in Th, that is why I
changed name of this package.
I know that browser-plugins would be the best solution, but I'm not
sure whether it supports this kind of extensions.
--
Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> Use LT_OUTPUT to get local libtool earlier (see glib2-lt.patch).
Thanks for the hint!
--
Marcin Banasiak
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
es/gpk-install-mime-type.png
--
Marcin Banasiak
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
requires directory provided by online-desktop and
python module (ddm), whereas online-desktop requires bigboard to work
properly.
I think that in this case circular dependencies aren't anything bad.
Both packages don't require each other to build, so I don't see how it
can be a bad t
umentation where it's explained?
--
Marcin Banasiak
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Kamil Dziedzic wrote:
> Should I add them as R: or S: in inkscape.spec?
I think that S: should be fine.
--
Marcin Banasiak
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
g. When there are more than one Suggest it ask to
> install
> them all. It should ask for each separately. Example:
I made patch for that, please test it.
--
Marcin Banasiak
diff -urN poldek/ask.c poldek.new/ask.c
--- poldek/ask.c 2007-07-08 18:48:11.0 +0200
+++ poldek.new/ask.c
Krystian Tomczyk wrote:
> wine-0.9.49-1.i686 suggests installation of: binfmt-detector
> Try to install it? [N/y]
>
> Maybe first test if package is installed and if not then write this
> question?
It's already reported as a bug in our Bugzilla (bug #38).
2007/4/18, Adam Gołębiowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > SPECS:
> >xfce4-dict.plugin.spec (NONE -> 1.1) (NEW)
>
> ehrm... seems like obvious mistake:
>
> mv xfce4-dict{,-}plugin.spec,v
Oops, my mistake. Sorry :-/
--
Marcin Banasiak
__
me.org/TwoPointSeventeen
(paragraph Release Suites).
> do you know how hard is later merge branches due large version mismatches
> between branches?
I know.
--
Marcin Banasiak
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http
2007/1/27, Tomasz Wittner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> error: espeak-1.19-0.1: req /usr/share/espeak-data/voices/!v not found
It looks like missing dir.
--
Marcin Banasiak
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://
21 matches
Mail list logo