t; grub2-2.02-0.beta2.2.i686 from works perfectly for me now.
>
> Big thanks for fixing this, regards,
>
Yeap
--
Szymon Siwek
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
s/gedit2:
>gedit2.spec (1.147 -> 1.148)
>
It looks strange for me:
Name: gedit2
Version: 3.0.0
--
Szymon Siwek
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
t; - BuildConflicts: gnutls-devel
> >
> > Files affected:
> > packages/gnutls:
> >gnutls.spec (1.106 -> 1.107)
>
> ?
details on pld-devel-pl
> ENOWAY
>
Without this BC libgnutls-openssl links with already installed gnutls.
--
Szymon Siwek
___
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 12:23:46AM +0200, Szymon Siwek wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 12:54:25AM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> > On Wednesday 22 October 2008 00:51, sls wrote:
> > > Author: sls Date: Tue Oct 21 21:51:50 2008 GMT
&
there's already wbxml2.spec
> >
> > Files affected:
> > SPECS:
> >libwbxml2.spec (1.5 -> NONE) (REMOVED)
>
> are now synce modifications merged to one source that you removed the other
> spec?
>
OK, maybe I was too
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 03:24:14PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On Thursday 28 August 2008 15:09:10 Szymon Siwek wrote:
> > > it recognizes file as HFS first, then as PNG, which is wrong imho as PNG
> > > has pretty clear mime-magic.
> >
> > Are you sure? "f
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 11:51:07AM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On Thursday 28 August 2008 01:20, Szymon Siwek wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 08:33:10PM +0200, Zsolt Udvari wrote:
> > > > What's going on? tent.png looks like proper PNG file. wesnoth builds
> >
; data/core/images/terrain/tent.png: ERROR: Macintosh HFS Extended
> version 61389 data (unclean) vasprintf failed (Invalid or incomplete
> multibyte or wide character)
>
OK, I see - file-4.25 is looney and doesn't recognize PNGs.
--
Szymon Siwek
___
+convert
> $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/wesnoth/data/core/images/terrain/tent.png{-,}
> +rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/wesnoth/data/core/images/terrain/tent.png-
> +
> # install additional docs
> install changelog README $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_docdir}/%{name}-%
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 08:33:46PM +0200, Szymon Siwek wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 07:35:19PM +0200, Zsolt Udvari wrote:
> > > It does not build for me (th/i686). Here is builder output:
> > > http://user.touk.pl/pzz/fet.log
> > Hm, I hate the devel-packages. So
te the list which contains all system-wide headers
> what the program want to include.
... and what about conditional includes?
> And it'd be good to know that what packages provides these files. OK,
> I can pipe to poldek but when the included files are very much it
> takes a ver
ungarian for all specs you'll be awarded Order Of The Red
Banner Of Labour.
Seriously - it's good to have descriptions in all languages but only
english is required - for example glen doesn't care about estonian
translations.
--
Szymon Siwek
___
devel
> %endif
> %if %{with qt}
To pewne? Mi się budowało bez readlina.
--
Szymon Siwek
"Nikt nie jest zadowolny ze swojej fortuny,
za to każdy - ze swego rozumu" -- Franciszek de La Rochefoucauld
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel
e much gain other
> than security by obscurity
>
...and similar suggestion about /srv
--
Szymon Siwek
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
etworking
> Source0:
> http://dl.sourceforge.net/filezilla/%{name}_%{version}_src.tar.bz2
Why not rel 1.1?
--
Szymon Siwek
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
based on some last similiar changes.
Unfortunately, template-lib.spec doesn't help.
So, should I use %ghost?
--
Szymon Siwek
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 01:48:19AM +0100, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk wrote:
> Dnia 06-03-2007, wto o godzinie 01:14 +0100, Szymon Siwek napisał(a):
>
> > It's definitely gcc-4.2 related (th-i686)
>
> What about gcc-4.1.2?
>
Works nice (no described problem wi
ws about the problem. Qrczak says that's gcc 4.2 related but
> doesn't
> know any details (or even source of that info I guess).
>
It's definitely gcc-4.2 related (th-i686)
--
Szymon Siwek
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 03:49:43PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
>
> There is a problem with gcc-java vs java-sun-tools. These packages are
> conflicting on each other but tons of java specs require one or another. This
> means that manual uninstalling/installing on builders is required.
>
On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 11:30:26PM +0100, Tomasz Pala wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 05:49:08PM +0100, Artur Frysiak wrote:
> >
> > Remove *.la, test dia, commit. ;-)
>
> *** glibc detected *** dia: free(): invalid pointer: 0x09474ea0 ***
>
> I don't know how to cope with this, the program doe
20 matches
Mail list logo
