Dnia Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 08:56:25PM +0100, Jakub Bogusz napisał(a):
> On Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 08:39:39PM +0100, witekfl wrote:
> > commit 3b3013be1262989c7a7df78ffab6d797766b6486
> > Author: Witold Filipczyk
> > Date: Sat Feb 3 20:24:04 2024 +0100
> >
> >
Dnia Tue, May 17, 2022 at 03:10:44PM +0200, Peri Noid napisał(a):
> Dnia wtorek, 17 maja 2022 10:47:35 CEST Andrzej Zawadzki pisze:
> >Hi,
> >
> >after upgrade.
> >
> >Do we need rebuild with newer libraries?
> >
> >Application: Powiadomienia Odkrywcy (DiscoverNotifier), signal:
ut this is strange that it needs binary at build
>time.
Try release 1.1, but to really check you must uninstall/rename freerdp binary
at build time.
>
>--
>
>Andrzej Zawadzki
>
>On 09.07.2021 20:15, witekfl wrote:
>
> commit 7632d3b22df6b289ba3bc5285530bf
Hi,
kernel-5.13.0-1 is with debug, a bit big.
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 08:56:47PM +0100, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 08:56:17PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> > this must be reverted:
> >
> > $ rpm -qf /lib64
> > FHS-2.3-37.i686
>
> Uh, %with macro misuse. Fixed.
The same issue is in the filesysytem.spec
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 12:35:28PM +0100, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Dec 2014, Witold Filipczyk wrote:
> >
> > Kernel build for non-PAE i686 is what I want.
>
> Will be there today on i686, but only for head, so no vserver.
Thanks.
__
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 09:01:58PM +0100, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
> TL;DR Future of i486 is bleak, it's a strong candidate for removal.
>
> Proposal: remove i486 from Th.
>
> Rationale:
>
> It's increasingly more problematic to get everything built on i486, some
> packages explicitly say "no" to t
W dniu 22.03.2014 o 20:47 Kacper Kornet pisze:
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 09:35:42AM +0100, witekfl wrote:
commit 8cd07b070798719c37aeece598a1ee99c0674596
Author: Witold Filipczyk
Date: Sat Feb 15 09:33:06 2014 +0100
- BR: libsemanage-devel libsemanage-static
- added at-char
Jakub Bogusz pld-linux.org> writes:
>
> How to split it?
> One big package is too big e.g. for non-GUI apps.
>
> RH/Fedora uses base and -gui.
> Rosa (Mandriva?) uses libqt5core etc.
>
> In qt4 we used QtModule convention - should we follow it, using Qt5Module
> packages?
>
> Alternatives are
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 07:10:09PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 06:55:12PM +0200, witekfl wrote:
> > Author: witekfl Date: Wed Oct 18 16:55:12 2006 GMT
> > Module: SOURCES Tag: HEAD
> > Log message:
> > - fix for gcc-4.x
>
10 matches
Mail list logo