On Sunday 23 of September 2007, Krystian Tomczyk wrote:
> Dnia 23-09-2007, N o godzinie 19:25 +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
>
> napisał(a):
> > Please test latest HEAD rpm and poldek.
>
> rpm -q rpm poldek
> rpm-4.4.9-9.i686
> poldek-0.21-0.20070703.00.4.i686
>
> >From th-test - works for me :)
Be V
Dnia 23-09-2007, N o godzinie 19:25 +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
napisał(a):
> Please test latest HEAD rpm and poldek.
rpm -q rpm poldek
rpm-4.4.9-9.i686
poldek-0.21-0.20070703.00.4.i686
>From th-test - works for me :)
--
Pozdrawiam
Krystian T.
"errare humanum est..."
___
On Tuesday 18 of September 2007, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
> On 9/18/07, Marcin Kurzyna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > To specify even more. Above hardcoded path is relevant only for 3 files:
> >
> > Basenames
> > Conflictname
> > Providename
> >
> > and of course hardlinks work as well. ok - end of s
On 9/18/07, Marcin Kurzyna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To specify even more. Above hardcoded path is relevant only for 3 files:
>
> Basenames
> Conflictname
> Providename
>
> and of course hardlinks work as well. ok - end of self replys
arekm promised to take a look into the backported code for a
To specify even more. Above hardcoded path is relevant only for 3 files:
Basenames
Conflictname
Providename
and of course hardlinks work as well. ok - end of self replys
marcin
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://l
Ok, the problem is that rpm/db4(?) hardcodes file locations into database
files so for example opening Basename searches always
for /vservers/test-system/.rpmdb/Basenames which doesn't exist inside
vserver.
I've got vpoldek/vrpm working after:
mkdir -p /vservers/test-system/vservers/test-syst
On Tuesday 04 September 2007 18:54:03 Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
> If there is no other solution I will do that tomorrow. I'd rather have
> current rpm fixed though (if it's rpm that needs a fix).
was this fixed in any way (so that vservers would work with current rpm/db)?
i've just posted to users-
On 9/4/07, Jeff Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sep 4, 2007, at 12:09 PM, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
> > Since yesterday my production machine is unusable and I can't
> > downgrade rpm as db version changed.
> Use db_dump from the newer rpm package, db_load from the older rpm
> package.
If t
On Sep 4, 2007, at 12:09 PM, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
>
>
> Since yesterday my production machine is unusable and I can't
> downgrade rpm as db version changed.
>
Use db_dump from the newer rpm package, db_load from the older rpm
package.
Do the following
cd /var/lib/rpm
mv Packages P
On 9/4/07, Elan Ruusamäe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> so then the old patch is outdated.
Can anyone try the current util-vserver without this patch? I can't as
rpm 4.4.-9-8 does not work with vrpm at all :/
Since yesterday my production machine is unusable and I can't
downgrade rpm as db version
On Tuesday 04 September 2007 16:54:41 Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
> On 9/4/07, Elan Ruusamäe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 04 September 2007 15:48:15 Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
> > > Can anyone tell me what is the original util-vserver-vrpm.patch from
> > > the spec trying to achieve? Other than
On 9/4/07, Elan Ruusamäe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 September 2007 15:48:15 Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
> > Can anyone tell me what is the original util-vserver-vrpm.patch from
> > the spec trying to achieve? Other than making vrpm and vpoldek die of
> > course.
>
> date: 2006/01/20 15:5
On Tuesday 04 September 2007 15:48:15 Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
> Can anyone tell me what is the original util-vserver-vrpm.patch from
> the spec trying to achieve? Other than making vrpm and vpoldek die of
> course.
date: 2006/01/20 15:52:24; author: baggins; state: Exp;
- do chbind for rpm (lack
On Tue, 04 Sep 2007, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
> Can anyone tell me what is the original util-vserver-vrpm.patch from
> the spec trying to achieve? Other than making vrpm and vpoldek die of
> course.
What's so hard in doing `cvs log util-vserver-vrpm.patch`?
Janek
--
Jan Rekorajski| A
Can anyone tell me what is the original util-vserver-vrpm.patch from
the spec trying to achieve? Other than making vrpm and vpoldek die of
course.
--
Patryk Zawadzki
Generated Content
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http:/
Sorry, ate my patch.
--
Patryk Zawadzki
Generated Content
--- /usr/lib/util-vserver/functions~2007-09-04 10:26:37.284704897 +0200
+++ /usr/lib/util-vserver/functions 2007-09-04 10:26:53.782187851 +0200
@@ -1171,5 +1171,5 @@
export RPM_FAKE_CHROOT RPM_FAKE_CTX RPM_FAKE_CAP RPM_FAKE_FL
Yesterday I finally forced vrpm and vpoldek to work predictably.
Details follow:
* vrpm won't work until the attached patch is applied to utils-vserver
(ncontext: vc_net_create(): Invalid argument)
* vpoldek won't work until you:
for i in /etc/vservers/*/apps/pkgmgmt/base/rpm/etc/macros
do
17 matches
Mail list logo
