Re: [packages/asterisk] Note about the ASTERISK_12 branch

2014-01-24 Thread Michael Shigorin
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 10:14:44PM +0100, Jacek Konieczny wrote: > > Can you marege it to master? What we have in Th (10.0.1) is from > > November 2012 and what we have on master (10.12.2) does not build. > > IMO there is no point in waiting, especially if it works. > It will take months before I r

Re: [packages/asterisk] Note about the ASTERISK_12 branch

2014-01-24 Thread Caleb Maclennan
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 11:14 PM, Jacek Konieczny wrote: > Before merging on master I would like to see opinion of anybody using > the asterisk package. > I am using the 1.8 packages in production but the boxes are EOLed and I'm in the process of migrating the services, so I don't plan on upgrad

Re: [packages/asterisk] Note about the ASTERISK_12 branch

2014-01-24 Thread Jacek Konieczny
On 2014-01-24 21:44, Jan Rękorajski wrote: > Hi, > Can you marege it to master? What we have in Th (10.0.1) is from > November 2012 and what we have on master (10.12.2) does not build. > IMO there is no point in waiting, especially if it works. It will take months before I really test this in prod

Re: [packages/asterisk] Note about the ASTERISK_12 branch

2014-01-24 Thread Jan Rękorajski
Hi, Can you marege it to master? What we have in Th (10.0.1) is from November 2012 and what we have on master (10.12.2) does not build. IMO there is no point in waiting, especially if it works. On Wed, 08 Jan 2014, jajcus wrote: > commit b9799345287553d52115e094d0d2a95693a0fb89 > Author: Jacek Ko