On 2016-07-29 13:10, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On 28.07.2016 23:39, Tomasz Pala wrote:
who knows what device would become available at /dev/ipmi0 at next
reboot... (unless cleaned in rc.sysinit). This package should be banned,
+1
I'm considering C: ipmi-init somewhere, but I'm not sure where to
On 28.07.2016 23:39, Tomasz Pala wrote:
And take a look at this ipmi.init - it creates static device node (in
non-devfs systems) with RANDOM (not permanently assigned in kernel) major!
if [ ! -c /dev/ipmi0 ] && [ $RETVAL -eq 0 ]; then
major=$(awk '/ ipmidev$/{print $1}' /proc/devices)
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 14:08:35 +0200, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
>> Local IPMI handling is *required* for watchdog only,
>
> ipmievd is another local user.
Can be remote as well: -H. As it's more reliable to handle BMC from
separate machine than the monitored one. OTOH /dev/watchdog must be
On Thursday 28 of July 2016, Tomasz Pala wrote:
> Local IPMI handling is *required* for watchdog only,
ipmievd is another local user.
--
Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz, arekm / ( maven.pl | pld-linux.org )
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 13:54:05 +0200, Tomasz Pala wrote:
>>> as you did not replaced existing "-init" solution with described one,
>
> One more thing: since apparently it's beyond your comprehension, that
And, please don't add S: apache to firefox. You know, local clients,
remote servers
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 13:46:23 +0200, Tomasz Pala wrote:
>> as you did not replaced existing "-init" solution with described one,
One more thing: since apparently it's beyond your comprehension, that
Suggests matters only during install time, thus removing it doesn't change
anything in
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 13:08:56 +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> as you did not replaced existing "-init" solution with described one,
This was not a solution, but some nasty unnecessary scripting,
duplicating existing function of loading specified modules at system
start.
> you should not just
On 28.07.2016 00:50, Tomasz Pala wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 23:31:36 +0200, Tomasz Pala wrote:
>>it's soft dep. soft deps are to inform user of suggested packages
>
>And this one should not be suggested. This package should be entirely
>removed.
Similar cleanup was done years ago in
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 23:31:36 +0200, Tomasz Pala wrote:
>> it's soft dep. soft deps are to inform user of suggested packages
>
> And this one should not be suggested. This package should be entirely
> removed.
Similar cleanup was done years ago in lm_sensors:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 00:26:13 +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> it's soft dep. soft deps are to inform user of suggested packages
And this one should not be suggested. This package should be entirely
removed.
> revert your removal.
Forget it.
--
Tomasz Pala
it's soft dep. soft deps are to inform user of suggested packages
revert your removal.
On 27.07.2016 22:06, gotar wrote:
commit 30c556b20dde02d4520b85755006804f1dcb1aec
Author: Tomasz Pala
Date: Wed Jul 27 21:06:04 2016 +0200
do not suggest some crafted script
11 matches
Mail list logo