On Wednesday 07 June 2006 23:09, Mariusz Mazur wrote:
> There was a tragic accident resulting in four out of five th builders
> getting seriously mutilated. The lucky survivor is x86-64. Since it's
> generally agreed that this is currently the best architecture around and
> bound to become the most
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 11:09:00PM +0200, Mariusz Mazur wrote:
> There was a tragic accident resulting in four out of five th builders getting
> seriously mutilated. The lucky survivor is x86-64. Since it's generally
> agreed that this is currently the best architecture around and bound to
> bec
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 23:09 +0200, Mariusz Mazur wrote:
> There was a tragic accident resulting in four out of five th builders getting
> seriously mutilated. The lucky survivor is x86-64. Since it's generally
> agreed that this is currently the best architecture around and bound to
> become the
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 23:09 +0200, Mariusz Mazur wrote:
> There was a tragic accident resulting in four out of five th builders getting
> seriously mutilated. The lucky survivor is x86-64. Since it's generally
> agreed that this is currently the best architecture around and bound to
> become the
There was a tragic accident resulting in four out of five th builders getting
seriously mutilated. The lucky survivor is x86-64. Since it's generally
agreed that this is currently the best architecture around and bound to
become the most popular, I've decided to have pld3.0 support only one arch
