Jeff Johnson [18-01-2009 17:37]:
> On Jan 18, 2009, at 10:56 AM, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote:
>> Jeff Johnson [18-01-2009 16:31]:
>> [...]
>>> Is the AUTODEP_PKGNAMES portion of the rpm-pld-autodep.patch, which
>>> maps dependencies back to package names, actually useful/used by PLD?
>> No.
>> It ha
On Jan 18, 2009, at 10:56 AM, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote:
> Jeff Johnson [18-01-2009 16:31]:
> [...]
>> Is the AUTODEP_PKGNAMES portion of the rpm-pld-autodep.patch, which
>> maps
>> dependencies back to package names, actually useful/used by PLD? The
>
> No.
>
> It has been turned off for Th, a
Jeff Johnson [18-01-2009 16:31]:
[...]
> Is the AUTODEP_PKGNAMES portion of the rpm-pld-autodep.patch, which maps
> dependencies back to package names, actually useful/used by PLD? The
No.
It has been turned off for Th, as it's an endless source of annoyances
for cases where multiple packages
I'm actively merging PLD patches for RPM from SOURCES found at
:pserver:c...@anoncvs.pld-linux.org:/cvsroot
into @rpm5.org CVS HEAD over the next couple months.
My immediate goal is to get global dependency filtering through
exclude patterns
into @rpm5.org. The rpm-pld-autodep.patch is c
