Re: PAE on i686 by default in TH

2009-02-11 Thread Piotr Budny
Dnia wtorek, 10 lutego 2009, Patryk Zawadzki napisaƂ: On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 7:52 PM, Marcin Krol h...@limanowa.net wrote: * 4GB is more and more common on consumer grade machines (heck, my not-so-now custom made laptop has 4GB) Yet with PAE single process still won't be able to allocate

Re: PAE on i686 by default in TH

2009-02-11 Thread Michael Shigorin
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 02:51:24PM +0100, Pawel Golaszewski wrote: Only the Pentium M is problem. *not? VIA C3 (IIRC C7 too) don't do PAE as well. -- WBR, Michael Shigorin m...@altlinux.ru -- Linux.Kiev http://www.linux.kiev.ua/ ___

Re: PAE on i686 by default in TH

2009-02-10 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009, Patryk Zawadzki wrote: Rationale: * only very old hardware like first Pentium M chips does not support hardware 3 years is very old? Come on... I have 2 laptops, both are non-PAE... Only the newest one with C2D on board is. Only the Pentium M is problem. Sonoma with

Re: PAE on i686 by default in TH

2009-02-10 Thread Marcin Krol
* 4GB is more and more common on consumer grade machines (heck, my not-so-now custom made laptop has 4GB) Yet with PAE single process still won't be able to allocate more than ~3.2 gigs of RAM. So if someone really want to use more than 4 gigs of memory x86_64 is way better choice. * some

Re: PAE on i686 by default in TH

2009-02-10 Thread Patryk Zawadzki
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 7:52 PM, Marcin Krol h...@limanowa.net wrote: * 4GB is more and more common on consumer grade machines (heck, my not-so-now custom made laptop has 4GB) Yet with PAE single process still won't be able to allocate more than ~3.2 gigs of RAM. So if someone really want to