On 04/12/2018 00:04, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
It isn't:
the repo is updating (maybe always was), i.e
contents of ~/SPECS is being committed to
/cvs/root/gitolite/repositories/SPECS.git
but your spec is not written to SPECS:
```
root@1822-cvs services/git# l -rt ~git/SPECS|tail
On 03/12/2018 21:49, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
>
>
> On 03/12/2018 22:32, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
>> Script used git.pld-linux.org/SPECS.git repo which is outdated
> it's actually up to date. at least now
>
> ```
> [~/all-specs (master)★] ➔ g fetch git://git.pld-linux.org/SPECS
> From
On 03/12/2018 22:32, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
Script used git.pld-linux.org/SPECS.git repo which is outdated
it's actually up to date. at least now
```
[~/all-specs (master)★] ➔ g fetch git://git.pld-linux.org/SPECS
From git://git.pld-linux.org/SPECS
* branch HEAD ->
On 03/12/2018 21:30, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
On 02/12/2018 13:37, Jan Palus wrote:
Is this update job working correctly? Just few examples that are out of date:
avfs(11) [OLD] 1.0.0 [NEW] 1.0.6 --> 1.0.6 is in Git for a week now
ell(12) [OLD] 0.12 [NEW] 0.14 --> the latest version is
On 02/12/2018 13:37, Jan Palus wrote:
> Is this update job working correctly? Just few examples that are out of date:
>
>
> avfs(11) [OLD] 1.0.0 [NEW] 1.0.6 --> 1.0.6 is in Git for a week now
> ell(12) [OLD] 0.12 [NEW] 0.14 --> the latest version is 0.15 not 0.14 and 0.15
>
Is this update job working correctly? Just few examples that are out of date:
avfs(11) [OLD] 1.0.0 [NEW] 1.0.6 --> 1.0.6 is in Git for a week now
ell(12) [OLD] 0.12 [NEW] 0.14 --> the latest version is 0.15 not 0.14 and 0.15
is in repo for 2 weeks now
fixed them all
On 08.11.2015 16:22, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
Found a few (probably not all):
+SDL_net [OLD] 1.2.8 [NEW] 2.0.0
2.0.0 refers only to "SDL2_net" files in sources directory (SDL2_net is
different package)
added new sdl_net project and distro mapping
On Sunday 08 of November 2015, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> Found a few (probably not all):
> > +SDL_net [OLD] 1.2.8 [NEW] 2.0.0
>
> 2.0.0 refers only to "SDL2_net" files in sources directory (SDL2_net is
> different package)
[...]
It uses pldnotify only, so if these are new false positive then
Found a few (probably not all):
> +SDL_net [OLD] 1.2.8 [NEW] 2.0.0
2.0.0 refers only to "SDL2_net" files in sources directory (SDL2_net is
different package)
> +belle-sip [OLD] 1.4.1 [NEW] 3.9.0
3.9.0 seems to be latest linphone version
(in
On Tuesday 24 of July 2012 17:32:08 Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
On Tuesday 24 of July 2012, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
Has git migration stopped PLD-update-TODO updates?
It is not changed to work with git (yet).
Some people (like me) can't develop without this file.I'm waiting for it. Good
luck
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 07:33:27PM +0200, Lukasz Glebicki wrote:
On Tuesday 24 of July 2012 17:32:08 Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
On Tuesday 24 of July 2012, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
Has git migration stopped PLD-update-TODO updates?
It is not changed to work with git (yet).
Some people
Has git migration stopped PLD-update-TODO updates?
--
Jakub Boguszhttp://qboosh.pl/
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
On Tuesday 24 of July 2012, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
Has git migration stopped PLD-update-TODO updates?
It is not changed to work with git (yet).
--
Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz, arekm / maven.pl
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 13:20, arekm ar...@pld-linux.org wrote:
-busybox(42) [OLD] 1.16.2 [NEW] 1.17.3
I've been thinking a little about the notify script that generates
these messages. I'm working on a special purpose live-cd project and
upgrading the software that will go into it, so it's been
On Tuesday 09 of November 2010, Caleb Maclennan wrote:
I've been thinking a little about the notify script that generates
these messages. I'm working on a special purpose live-cd project and
upgrading the software that will go into it, so it's been a useful
little script.
[...]
This is very
15 matches
Mail list logo
