Re: Question about %ghost

2007-11-12 Thread Kamil Dziedzic
Dnia poniedziałek 12 listopad 2007, Elan Ruusamäe napisał: > On Monday 12 November 2007 13:23:49 Kamil Dziedzic wrote: > > Btw. which version is correct? With %ghost at begining or after %attr?: > > the %attr doesn't play role as the file is not really installed (jbj would > say %ghost files not in

Re: Question about %ghost

2007-11-12 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On Monday 12 November 2007 13:23:49 Kamil Dziedzic wrote: > Btw. which version is correct? With %ghost at begining or after %attr?: the %attr doesn't play role as the file is not really installed (jbj would say %ghost files not included in rpm payload or sth) but if adapter wants to have %attr th

Re: Question about %ghost

2007-11-12 Thread Kamil Dziedzic
Btw. which version is correct? With %ghost at begining or after %attr?: @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ %files libs %defattr(644,root,root,755) %attr(755,root,root) %{_libdir}/libmcs.so.*.*.* -%ghost %attr(755,root,root) %{_libdir}/libmcs.so.? +%attr(755,root,root) %ghost %attr(755,root,root) %{_libdir}/libm