Dnia piątek, 15 grudnia 2006 16:30, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz napisał:
> It's a RedHat fork (starting from older rpm version that they use in Fedora
> etc). They want now to build community around their rpm version I guess.
And it made some people on #rpm rather irritated...
But let's hope for the bes
On Friday 15 December 2006 16:14, Michał Łukaszek wrote:
> On 12/15/06, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Eh, that's another RPM fork? So we have 3 forks now. RedHat rpm, jbj rpm
> > (we use this one at this moment) and rpm.org rpm. Someone is crazy.
>
> If I get this right, this
On 12/15/06, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eh, that's another RPM fork? So we have 3 forks now. RedHat rpm, jbj rpm (we
> use this one at this moment) and rpm.org rpm. Someone is crazy.
If I get this right, this is not supposed to be a fork.
The main idea is to centralize deve
On Friday 15 December 2006 10:05, Michał Łukaszek wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> http://rpm.org/
>
> Do we have anyone collaborating with them?
Eh, that's another RPM fork? So we have 3 forks now. RedHat rpm, jbj rpm (we
use this one at this moment) and rpm.org rpm. Someone is crazy.
> AFAIK we're the d
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 10:05:18AM +0100, Michał Łukaszek wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> http://rpm.org/
>
> Do we have anyone collaborating with them?
> AFAIK we're the distribution which has the most patched RPM ever ;)
I don't think so. E.g. SuSE's binary patches are bigger change.
> why not share t
Hey guys,
http://rpm.org/
Do we have anyone collaborating with them?
AFAIK we're the distribution which has the most patched RPM ever ;)
why not share the ideas in current circumstances?
--
regards
Michał Łukaszek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
pld-devel-en ma
